The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of Home‐Based Intervention on Unplanned Readmissions and Out‐of‐Hospital Deaths
Abstract
OBJECTIVE : To determine the effect of a home‐based intervention (HBI) on the frequency of unplanned readmission and out‐of‐hospital death among patients discharged home from acute hospital care. DESIGN : A randomized controlled trial comparing HBI with usual care (UC). SETTING : A tertiary referral hospital servicing the northwestern region of Adelaide, South Australia. PARTICIPANTS : Medical and surgical patients (n = 762) discharged home after hospitalization. INTERVENTION : Home‐based intervention (n = 381) consisted of counseling of all patients before discharge followed by a single home visit (by a nurse and pharmacist) to those patients considered to be at high risk of readmission (n = 314) in order to optimize compliance with and knowledge of the treatment regimen, identify early clinical deterioration, and intensify follow‐up of such patients where appropriate. MEASUREMENTS : The primary endpoint was the number of unplanned readmissions plus out‐of‐hospital deaths over a 6‐month follow‐up period. RESULTS : During the study follow‐up, the major endpoint occurred most commonly in the UC group (217 vs 155 episodes: P < .001). Overall, the HBI group demonstrated fewer unplanned readmissions (154 vs 197: P = .022), out‐of‐hospital deaths (1 vs. 20: P < .001), total deaths (12 vs. 29: P = .006), emergency department attendances (236 vs 314: P < .001), and total days of hospitalization (1452 vs 1766: P < .001). There was a disproportionate reduction in multiple events among HBI patients ( P = .035). Hospital‐based costs of health care during study follow‐up tended to be lower in the HBI group ($A2190 vs $A2680 per patient: P = .102). Mean cost of HBI was $A190 per patient visited, whereas other community‐based health care costs were similar for both groups. CONCLUSIONS : Among high‐risk patients discharged from acute hospital care, HBI is beneficial in limiting unplanned readmissions and reducing risk of out‐of‐hospital death. It may be particularly cost‐effective if applied selectively to patients with a history of frequent unplanned hospital admission.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Comprehensive geriatric assessment: a meta-analysis of controlled trials
Stuck, A. E., Siu, A. L., Wieland, G. D., Rubenstein, L. Z., & Adams, J. (1993) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(93)92884-v · Cited by 1,974
Cited by
Beswick, A. D., Rees, K., Dieppe, P., Ayis, S., Gooberman-Hill, R., Horwood, J., & Ebrahim, S. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60342-6 · Cited by 780
Holland, R., Lenaghan, E., Harvey, I., Smith, R., Shepstone, L., Lipp, A., Christou, M., Evans, D., & Hand, C. (2005) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.38338.674583.ae · Cited by 331
Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment
Wieland, D., & Hirth, V. (2003) · Cancer Control · doi:10.1177/107327480301000603 · Cited by 330
Hughes, S. L. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.284.22.2877 · Cited by 323
Mistiaen, P., & Poot, E. (2006) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004510.pub3 · Cited by 299
Metadata
- Authors
- Stewart, S., Pearson, S., Luke, C. G., & Horowitz, J. D.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-02
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 174-180
- ISSN
- 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-5415
- OpenAlex
- W2019644565
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Home‐Based Intervention on Unplanned Readmissions and Out‐of‐Hospital Deaths. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1998.tb02535.x
- The paper
- Stewart, S., Pearson, S., Luke, C. G., & Horowitz, J. D. (1998). Effects of Home‐Based Intervention on Unplanned Readmissions and Out‐of‐Hospital Deaths. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1998.tb02535.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.