The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Effectiveness of a Community‐Based Program for Reducing the Incidence of Falls in the Elderly: A Randomized Trial
Abstract
Objectives: To test whether Stepping On, a multifaceted community‐based program using a small‐group learning environment, is effective in reducing falls in at‐risk people living at home. Design: A randomized trial with subjects followed for 14 months. Setting: The interventions were conducted in community venues, with a follow‐up home visit. Participants: Three hundred ten community residents aged 70 and older who had had a fall in the previous 12 months or were concerned about falling. Intervention: The Stepping On program aims to improve fall self‐efficacy, encourage behavioral change, and reduce falls. Key aspects of the program are improving lower‐limb balance and strength, improving home and community environmental and behavioral safety, encouraging regular visual screening, making adaptations to low vision, and encouraging medication review. Two‐hour sessions were conducted weekly for 7 weeks, with a follow‐up occupational therapy home visit. Measurements: The primary outcome measure was falls, ascertained using a monthly calendar mailed by each participant. Results: The intervention group experienced a 31% reduction in falls (relative risk (RR)=0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.50–0.96; P =.025). This was a clinically meaningful result demonstrating that the Stepping On program was effective for community‐residing elderly people. Secondary analysis of subgroups showed that it was particularly effective for men (n=80; RR=0.32, 95% CI=0.17–0.59). Conclusion: The results of this study renew attention to the idea that cognitive‐behavioral learning in a small‐group environment can reduce falls. Stepping On offers a successful fall‐prevention option.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-efficacy: The exercise of control
Bandura, A., Freeman, W. H., & Lightsey, R. (1999) · Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158 · Cited by 46,835
The Effects of Ambient Air Pollution on School Absenteeism Due to Respiratory Illnesses
Gilliland, F. D., Berhane, K., Rappaport, E. B., Thomas, D. C., Avol, E., Gauderman, W. J., London, S. J., Margolis, H. G., McConnell, R., Islam, K. T., et al. (2001) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/00001648-200101000-00009 · Cited by 266
Cited by
Interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community
Gillespie, L. D., Robertson, M. C., Gillespie, W. J., Sherrington, C., Gates, S., Clemson, L., & Lamb, S. E. (2012) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007146.pub3 · Cited by 3,966
Self-citationBeswick, A. D., Rees, K., Dieppe, P., Ayis, S., Gooberman-Hill, R., Horwood, J., & Ebrahim, S. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60342-6 · Cited by 780
Wahl, H.-W., Fange, A., Oswald, F., Gitlin, L. N., & Iwarsson, S. (2009) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/gnp056 · Cited by 315
Choi, M., & Hector, M. (2012) · Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2011.04.022 · Cited by 127
Iwarsson, S., Horstmann, V., Carlsson, G., Oswald, F., & Wahl, H.-W. (2009) · Clinical Rehabilitation · doi:10.1177/0269215508101740 · Cited by 94
Metadata
- Authors
- Clemson, L., Cumming, R. G., Kendig, H., Swann, M., Heard, R., & Taylor, K.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-08-16
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1487-1494
- ISSN
- 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-5415
- OpenAlex
- W1511543785
- Cited by
- 530
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 45.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.