Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 345

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Race and Sex Differences in Age‐Related Hearing Loss: The Health, Aging and Body Composition Study

Helzner, Elizabeth P., Cauley, Jane A., Pratt, Sheila R., Wisniewski, Steven R., Zmuda, Joseph M., Talbott, Evelyn O., de Rekeneire, Nathalie, Harris, Tamara B., Rubin, Susan M., Simonsick, Eleanor M., Tylavsky, Frances A., Newman, Anne B.·2005·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the prevalence of and risk factors for hearing loss in a sample of 2,052 older adults (aged 73–84; 46.9% male, 37.3% black) enrolled in the Health, Aging and Body Composition (Health ABC) Study. Design: Cross‐sectional analysis of a longitudinal cohort study. Setting: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and Memphis, Tennessee, areas. Participants: Random sample of Medicare beneficiary subjects enrolled in the Health ABC program from 1997 to 1998. They included 2,052 individuals: 660 white men (32.2%), 631 white women (30.8%), 310 black men (15.1%), and 451 black women (22.0%). Participants ranged in age from 73 to 84, with a mean age of 77.5. Measurements: Hearing sensitivity was measured using pure‐tone threshold testing. Hearing loss was defined based on two averages of hearing thresholds: 500, 1,000, and 2,000 Hz greater than 25‐decibel (dB) hearing level (HL) (hearing loss); and 2,000, 4,000, and 8,000 Hz greater than 40‐dB HL (high‐frequency hearing loss). Potential hearing loss correlates, including demographics, medical history, ototoxic medication use, occupational noise exposure, and lifestyle factors, were collected via questionnaire. Results: The prevalence of hearing loss was 59.9%; the prevalence of high‐frequency hearing loss was 76.9%. Hearing loss was most common in white men, followed by white women, black men, and black women. Older age, white race, diabetes mellitus, cerebrovascular disease, smoking, poorer cognitive status, occupational noise exposure, and ear surgery were associated with hearing loss after multivariable adjustment. Race‐ and sex‐specific risk factors included higher blood pressure and occupational noise exposure (white men), poorer cognitive status and smoking (black women), and low total hip bone mineral density (black men). Possible protective factors included salicylate use (overall sample, black men) and moderate alcohol intake (black women). Conclusion: Hearing loss was extremely common in this population. Because many of the identified hearing loss risk factors are modifiable, some of the burden associated with hearing loss in older people should be preventable.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.00525.x

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 21 references

Cited by

See all 345

Metadata

Authors
Helzner, E. P., Cauley, J. A., Pratt, S. R., Wisniewski, S. R., Zmuda, J. M., Talbott, E. O., de Rekeneire, N., Harris, T. B., Rubin, S. M., Simonsick, E. M., Tylavsky, F. A., & Newman, A. B.
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-11-08
Volume
53
Issue
12
Pages
2119-2127
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W1519212907
Cited by
345
References
21
FWCI
2.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Race and Sex Differences in Age‐Related Hearing Loss: The Health, Aging and Body Composition Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.00525.x
The paper
Helzner, E. P., Cauley, J. A., Pratt, S. R., Wisniewski, S. R., Zmuda, J. M., Talbott, E. O., de Rekeneire, N., Harris, T. B., Rubin, S. M., Simonsick, E. M., Tylavsky, F. A., & Newman, A. B. (2005). Race and Sex Differences in Age‐Related Hearing Loss: The Health, Aging and Body Composition Study. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.00525.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.