Cited by 139Diabetes Management and EducationPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareDiabetes Treatment and Management

Self‐Reported Goals of Older Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Open access
Huang, Elbert S., Gorawara‐Bhat, Rita, Chin, Marshall H.·2005·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

Objectives: New diabetes mellitus guidelines from the American Geriatrics Society promote the individualization of treatment goals and plans for patients aged 65 and older. Communicating with older patients about such complex medical decisions presents new challenges for providers. The self‐reported healthcare goals, factors influencing these goals, and self‐care practices of older patients with diabetes mellitus were explored. Design: Exploratory study involving semistructured interviews. Setting: Four clinics of a midwestern, urban academic medical center. Participants: Patients aged 65 and older with type II diabetes mellitus (N=28). Measurements: Semistructured, one‐on‐one interviews were conducted. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, and evaluated for recurring themes using a grounded theory approach. Results: The majority of patients expressed their healthcare goals in a social and functional language, in contrast to the biomedical language of risk factor control and complication prevention, even when specifically asked about goals for diabetes mellitus care. Patient's predominant healthcare goals centered on maintaining their independence and their activities of daily living (71%). Medical experiences of friends and family (50%), social comparison with peers (7%), and medical professionals (43%) shaped patients' goals. Self‐reported medication adherence and glucose monitoring was high, but more than one‐quarter of patients failed to adhere to any dietary recommendations, and one‐third failed to adhere to their exercise regimens. Conclusion: As diabetes mellitus care recommendations for older patients grow more complex, providers could enhance their communication about such medical decisions by exploring patients' specific circumstances and reframing diabetes mellitus treatment goals in patients' own language. These may be crucial steps to developing successful individualized care plans.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53119.x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When asked about their health care goals, older diabetes patients focus most on their functional status and independence.

    “When asked about their health care goals, older diabetes patients focus most on their functional status and independence116.”

    From Diabetes in Older Adults: A Consensus Report (2012) · cites this paper as [116]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huang, E. S., Gorawara‐Bhat, R., & Chin, M. H.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Huang, Elbert S.
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-01-26
Volume
53
Issue
2
Pages
306-311
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W1592102337
Cited by
139
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 13
FWCI
4.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (K23AG021963, K12AG00488-10, K23 AG2196301A1, K12AG000488)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P60DK20595, P60DK020595)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, older adults, self-care, individualized treatment goals, patient-provider communication, medication adherence, glucose monitoring, dietary adherence, exercise adherence, activities of daily living, social comparison
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Delivery of Health Care, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Goals, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Self-Assessment, Self Care, Health Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review