The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multitasking: Association Between Poorer Performance and a History of Recurrent Falls
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: To examine the association between poorer performance on concurrent walking and reaction time and recurrent falls. DESIGN: Cross‐sectional analysis. SETTING: Community. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred seventy‐seven older community‐dwelling adults (mean age±standard deviation 78±3). MEASUREMENTS: Reaction times on push‐button and visual‐spatial decision tasks were assessed while seated and while walking a 20‐m course (straight walk) and a 20‐m course with a turn at 10 m (turn walk). Walking times were recorded while walking only and while performing a reaction‐time response. Dual‐task performance was calculated as the percentage change in task times when done in dual‐task versus single‐task conditions. A history of recurrent falls (≥2 vs ≤1 falls) in the prior 12 months was self‐reported. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to predict the standardized odds ratios (ORs) of recurrent falls history. The standardized unit for dual‐task performance ORs was interquartile range/2. RESULTS: On the push‐button task during the turn walk, poorer reaction time response (slower) was associated with 28% lower ( P =.04) odds of recurrent fall history. On the visual‐spatial task, poorer walking‐time response (slower) was associated with 34% ( P =.02) and 42% ( P =.01) higher odds of recurrent falls history on the straight and turn walks, respectively. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that walking more slowly in response to a visual‐spatial decision task may identify individuals at risk for multiple falls. Prospective studies are needed to confirm the prognostic value of poor walking responses in a dual‐task setting for multiple falls.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Risk Factors for Hip Fracture in White Women
Cummings, S. R., Nevitt, M. C., Browner, W. S., Stone, K., Fox, K. M., Ensrud, K. E., Cauley, J., Black, D., & Vogt, T. M. (1995) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199503233321202 · Cited by 3,595
Self-citation
Cited by
Silsupadol, P., Shumway-Cook, A., Lugade, V., van Donkelaar, P., Chou, L.-S., Mayr, U., & Woollacott, M. H. (2009) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2008.09.559 · Cited by 419
The interplay between gait, falls and cognition: can cognitive therapy reduce fall risk?
Segev-Jacubovski, O., Herman, T., Yogev-Seligmann, G., Mirelman, A., Giladi, N., & Hausdorff, J. M. (2011) · Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics · doi:10.1586/ern.11.69 · Cited by 317
Mayson, D. J., Kiely, D. K., LaRose, S. I., & Bean, J. F. (2008) · American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/phm.0b013e31818dfee5 · Cited by 75
Metadata
- Authors
- Faulkner, K. A., Redfern, M. S., Cauley, J. A., Landsittel, D. P., Studenski, S. A., Rosano, C., Simonsick, E. M., Harris, T. B., Shorr, R. I., Ayonayon, H. N., Newman, A. B., & for the Health, A.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-03-05
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 570-576
- ISSN
- 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-5415
- OpenAlex
- W2125256702
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 27.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multitasking: Association Between Poorer Performance and a History of Recurrent Falls. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01147.x
- The paper
- Faulkner, K. A., Redfern, M. S., Cauley, J. A., Landsittel, D. P., Studenski, S. A., Rosano, C., Simonsick, E. M., Harris, T. B., Shorr, R. I., Ayonayon, H. N., Newman, A. B., & for the Health, A. (2007). Multitasking: Association Between Poorer Performance and a History of Recurrent Falls. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01147.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.