Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 191

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multitasking: Association Between Poorer Performance and a History of Recurrent Falls

Open access
Faulkner, Kimberly A., Redfern, Mark S., Cauley, Jane A., Landsittel, Douglas P., Studenski, Stephanie A., Rosano, Caterina, Simonsick, Eleanor M., Harris, Tamara B., Shorr, Ronald I., Ayonayon, Hilsa N., Newman, Anne B., for the Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study·2007·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine the association between poorer performance on concurrent walking and reaction time and recurrent falls. DESIGN: Cross‐sectional analysis. SETTING: Community. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred seventy‐seven older community‐dwelling adults (mean age±standard deviation 78±3). MEASUREMENTS: Reaction times on push‐button and visual‐spatial decision tasks were assessed while seated and while walking a 20‐m course (straight walk) and a 20‐m course with a turn at 10 m (turn walk). Walking times were recorded while walking only and while performing a reaction‐time response. Dual‐task performance was calculated as the percentage change in task times when done in dual‐task versus single‐task conditions. A history of recurrent falls (≥2 vs ≤1 falls) in the prior 12 months was self‐reported. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to predict the standardized odds ratios (ORs) of recurrent falls history. The standardized unit for dual‐task performance ORs was interquartile range/2. RESULTS: On the push‐button task during the turn walk, poorer reaction time response (slower) was associated with 28% lower ( P =.04) odds of recurrent fall history. On the visual‐spatial task, poorer walking‐time response (slower) was associated with 34% ( P =.02) and 42% ( P =.01) higher odds of recurrent falls history on the straight and turn walks, respectively. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that walking more slowly in response to a visual‐spatial decision task may identify individuals at risk for multiple falls. Prospective studies are needed to confirm the prognostic value of poor walking responses in a dual‐task setting for multiple falls.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01147.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 191

Metadata

Authors
Faulkner, K. A., Redfern, M. S., Cauley, J. A., Landsittel, D. P., Studenski, S. A., Rosano, C., Simonsick, E. M., Harris, T. B., Shorr, R. I., Ayonayon, H. N., Newman, A. B., & for the Health, A.
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-03-05
Volume
55
Issue
4
Pages
570-576
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W2125256702
Cited by
191
References
1
FWCI
27.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multitasking: Association Between Poorer Performance and a History of Recurrent Falls. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01147.x
The paper
Faulkner, K. A., Redfern, M. S., Cauley, J. A., Landsittel, D. P., Studenski, S. A., Rosano, C., Simonsick, E. M., Harris, T. B., Shorr, R. I., Ayonayon, H. N., Newman, A. B., & for the Health, A. (2007). Multitasking: Association Between Poorer Performance and a History of Recurrent Falls. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01147.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.