Should Oral Nutritional Supplementation Be Given to Undernourished Older People upon Hospital Discharge? A Controlled Trial
Abstract
Objectives To determine whether the oral nutritional supplementation of undernourished older people upon discharge from hospital improves muscle function and reduces disability. Design Randomized controlled trial. Setting Community-based study in two centers in Scotland. Participants Two hundred fifty-three people. Intervention Randomization to oral nutritional supplementation (600 kcal/d) or control supplement of 200 kcal/d. Measurements Primary outcome (20-point activity of daily living Barthel Index) and secondary outcomes (handgrip strength, Sit-to-Stand test, and Euroquol) were measured at baseline (after discharge from the hospital and before supplement was commenced) and 8 and 16 weeks and accelerometry-measured physical activity levels at baseline and 16 weeks. Falls were recorded prospectively. Results Mean age was 82. There was no significant difference in change in Barthel score between supplement and control groups (adjusted mean difference=0.28, 95% confidence interval (CI)=-0.28-0.84). Handgrip strength improved more in the supplemented group (adjusted mean difference=1.52 kg, 95% CI=0.50-2.55; P=.004). The supplemented group exhibited modestly greater vector movement (overall activity) than controls (P=.02). There were no significant between-group differences in Sit-to-Stand test, health-related quality of life, or falls. Adherence was 38.2% in the nutritional supplement group and 50.0% in the control supplement group. Weight did not increase in the nutritional…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Two included studies found a positive effect of ONS on functional outcomes (handgrip and activities of daily living).
“Two of the included studies found a positive effect on functional outcomes (handgrip (122) and activities of daily living ( 123)).”
From ESPEN practical guideline: Clinical nutrition and hydration in geriatrics (2022) · cites this paper as [122]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 22 · Cited by 76
- Authors
- McMurdo, M. E. T., Price, R. J. G., Shields, M., Potter, J., & Stott, D. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Dundee (GB)
- ORCID
- Stott, David J.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-12
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2239-2245
- ISSN
- 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-5415
- OpenAlex
- W1513286003
- Cited by
- 76
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 3.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (submittedVersion)
- ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Dysphagia Assessment and Management
- Keywords
- oral nutritional supplementation, hospital discharge, muscle function, grip strength, disability, activities of daily living, physical activity, weight gain, falls, health-related quality of life
- MeSH terms
- Administration, Oral, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Persons with Disabilities, Humans, Male, Patient Discharge, Prospective Studies, Dietary Supplements, Malnutrition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review