Cited by 76Nutrition and Health in AgingClinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyDysphagia Assessment and Management

Should Oral Nutritional Supplementation Be Given to Undernourished Older People upon Hospital Discharge? A Controlled Trial

McMurdo, Marion E. T., Price, Rosemary J. G., Shields, Melanie, Potter, Jan, Stott, David J.·2009·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

Objectives To determine whether the oral nutritional supplementation of undernourished older people upon discharge from hospital improves muscle function and reduces disability. Design Randomized controlled trial. Setting Community-based study in two centers in Scotland. Participants Two hundred fifty-three people. Intervention Randomization to oral nutritional supplementation (600 kcal/d) or control supplement of 200 kcal/d. Measurements Primary outcome (20-point activity of daily living Barthel Index) and secondary outcomes (handgrip strength, Sit-to-Stand test, and Euroquol) were measured at baseline (after discharge from the hospital and before supplement was commenced) and 8 and 16 weeks and accelerometry-measured physical activity levels at baseline and 16 weeks. Falls were recorded prospectively. Results Mean age was 82. There was no significant difference in change in Barthel score between supplement and control groups (adjusted mean difference=0.28, 95% confidence interval (CI)=-0.28-0.84). Handgrip strength improved more in the supplemented group (adjusted mean difference=1.52 kg, 95% CI=0.50-2.55; P=.004). The supplemented group exhibited modestly greater vector movement (overall activity) than controls (P=.02). There were no significant between-group differences in Sit-to-Stand test, health-related quality of life, or falls. Adherence was 38.2% in the nutritional supplement group and 50.0% in the control supplement group. Weight did not increase in the nutritional…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02568.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two included studies found a positive effect of ONS on functional outcomes (handgrip and activities of daily living).

    “Two of the included studies found a positive effect on functional outcomes (handgrip (122) and activities of daily living ( 123)).”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 22 · Cited by 76

Authors
McMurdo, M. E. T., Price, R. J. G., Shields, M., Potter, J., & Stott, D. J.
Affiliations
University of Dundee (GB)
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-12
Volume
57
Issue
12
Pages
2239-2245
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W1513286003
Cited by
76
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (submittedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Dysphagia Assessment and Management
Keywords
oral nutritional supplementation, hospital discharge, muscle function, grip strength, disability, activities of daily living, physical activity, weight gain, falls, health-related quality of life
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Persons with Disabilities, Humans, Male, Patient Discharge, Prospective Studies, Dietary Supplements, Malnutrition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review