The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Effectiveness of Inpatient Geriatric Evaluation and Management Units: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To examine how geriatric evaluation and management units (GEMUs) are organized and to examine the effectiveness of admission on a GEMU. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta‐analysis based on literature search of multiple databases and the references lists of all identified articles and by contacting authors. SETTING: GEMUs. PARTICIPANTS: Elderly people admitted to a GEMU. MEASUREMENTS: Quality of the studies was assessed on 10 criteria. The outcome parameters were mortality, institutionalization, functional decline, readmission, and length of stay at different follow‐up points. A random‐effects meta‐analysis was performed using Hedges' gu and variance of relative risk (RR). RESULTS: GEMUs are organized in a heterogeneous way and the included studies gave no thorough description of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). Involvement of a multidisciplinary team was a key element in all GEMUs. The individual trials showed that admission to a GEMU has one or more favorable effects on the outcomes of interest, with two significant effects in the meta‐analysis: less functional decline at discharge from the GEMU (RR=0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.77–0.99; P =.04) and a lower rate of institutionalization 1 year after discharge (RR=0.78, CI=0.66–0.92; P =.003). For the other outcomes in the meta‐analysis, a GEMU did not induce significantly different outcomes than usual care. CONCLUSION: This meta‐analysis shows a significant effect in favor of the GEMU group on functional decline at discharge and on institutionalization after 1 year. There is heterogeneity between the studies, poor quality of some randomized controlled trials, and shortage of information about CGA. Multidisciplinary CGA offered in a GEMU may add value to the care for frail older persons admitted to the hospital, but the limitations confirm the need for well‐designed studies using explicit CGA and more‐structured and ‐coherent assessment instruments such as the Minimum Data Set Resident Assessment Instrument.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Assessment of Older People: Self-Maintaining and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living
Lawton, M. P., & Brody, E. M. (1969) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/9.3_part_1.179 · Cited by 18,540
Comprehensive geriatric assessment: a meta-analysis of controlled trials
Stuck, A. E., Siu, A. L., Wieland, G. D., Rubenstein, L. Z., & Adams, J. (1993) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(93)92884-v · Cited by 1,974
Hazards of Hospitalization of the Elderly
Creditor, M. C. (1993) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-118-3-199302010-00011 · Cited by 1,409
Hospitalization, Restricted Activity, and the Development of Disability Among Older Persons
Gill, T. M. (2004) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.292.17.2115 · Cited by 623
Counsell, S. R., Holder, C. M., Liebenauer, L. L., Palmer, R. M., Fortinsky, R. H., Kresevic, D. M., Quinn, L. M., Allen, K. R., Covinsky, K. E., & Landefeld, C. S. (2000) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb03866.x · Cited by 406 · cited 7×
“In most studies, treatment was identical for both groups except for an additional CGA in a GEMU in the intervention group.(20,29,30,32,37,39,41,42) Two studies partially met this criterion.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialHarari, D., Hopper, A., Dhesi, J., Babic-Illman, G., Lockwood, L., & Martin, F. (2007) · Age and Ageing · doi:10.1093/ageing/afl163 · Cited by 387
Cited by
Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older adults admitted to hospital
Ellis, G., Whitehead, M. A., O'Neill, D., Langhorne, P., & Robinson, D. (2011) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd006211.pub2 · Cited by 1,114
Ellis, G., Whitehead, M. A., Robinson, D., O'Neill, D., & Langhorne, P. (2011) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.d6553 · Cited by 1,068
Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older adults admitted to hospital
Ellis, G., Gardner, M., Tsiachristas, A., Langhorne, P., Burke, O., Harwood, R. H., Conroy, S. P., Kircher, T., Somme, D., Saltvedt, I., et al. (2017) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd006211.pub3 · Cited by 853
Pilotto, A., Cella, A., Pilotto, A., Daragjati, J., Veronese, N., Musacchio, C., Mello, A. M., Logroscino, G., Padovani, A., Prete, C., et al. (2017) · Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2016.11.004 · Cited by 454
Rijk, J. M., Roos, P. R., Deckx, L., van den Akker, M., & Buntinx, F. (2016) · Geriatrics & Gerontology International · doi:10.1111/ggi.12508 · Cited by 376
Metadata
- Authors
- Van Craen, K., Braes, T., Wellens, N., Denhaerynck, K., Flamaing, J., Moons, P., Boonen, S., Gosset, C., Petermans, J., & Milisen, K.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 83-92
- ISSN
- 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-5415
- OpenAlex
- W1605791297
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 1.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Effectiveness of Inpatient Geriatric Evaluation and Management Units: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02621.x
- The paper
- Van Craen, K., Braes, T., Wellens, N., Denhaerynck, K., Flamaing, J., Moons, P., Boonen, S., Gosset, C., Petermans, J., & Milisen, K. (2010). The Effectiveness of Inpatient Geriatric Evaluation and Management Units: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02621.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.