The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Nonlinear Relationship Between Gait Speed and Falls: The Maintenance of Balance, Independent Living, Intellect, and Zest in the Elderly of Boston Study
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: To examine the relationship between gait speed and falls risk. DESIGN: Longitudinal analysis of the association between gait speed and subsequent falls and analysis of gait speed decline as a predictor of future falls. SETTING: Population‐based cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Seven hundred sixty‐three community‐dwelling older adults underwent baseline assessments and were followed for falls; 600 completed an 18‐month follow‐up assessment to determine change in gait speed and were followed for subsequent falls. MEASUREMENTS: Gait speed was measured during a 4‐m walk, falls data were collected from monthly post‐card calendars, and covariates were collected from in‐home and clinic visits. RESULTS: There was a U‐shaped relationship between gait speed and falls, with participants with faster (≥1.3 m/s, incident rate ratio (IRR)=2.12, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.48–3.04) and slower (<0.6 m/s, IRR=1.60, 95% CI=1.06–2.42) gait speeds at higher risk than those with normal gait speeds (1.0–<1.3 m/s). In adjusted analyses, slower gait speeds were associated with greater risk of indoor falls (<0.6 m/s, IRR=2.17, 95% CI=1.33–3.55; 0.6–<1.0 m/s, IRR=1.45, 95% CI=1.08–1.94), and faster gait speed was associated with greater risk of outdoor falls (IRR=2.11, 95% CI=1.40–3.16). A gait speed decline of more than 0.15 m/s per year predicted greater risk of all falls (IRR=1.86, 95% CI=1.15–3.01). CONCLUSION: There is a nonlinear relationship between gait speed and falls, with a greater risk of outdoor falls in fast walkers and a greater risk of indoor falls in slow walkers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Physical performance measures in the clinical setting
Studenski, S., Perera, S., Wallace, D., Chandler, J. M., Duncan, P. W., Rooney, E., Fox, M., & Guralnik, J. M. (2003) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51104.x · Cited by 1,218
Cesari, M., Kritchevsky, S. B., Penninx, B. W. H. J., Nicklas, B. J., Simonsick, E. M., Newman, A. B., Tylavsky, F. A., Brach, J. S., Satterfield, S., Bauer, D. C., et al. (2005) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53501.x · Cited by 1,192
Incidence and predictors of falls in the Chinese elderly
Chu, L., Chi, I., & Chiu, A. (2005) · Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore · doi:10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.v34n1p60 · Cited by 316
Woo, J., Ho, S. C., & Yu, A. L. M. (1999) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb05209.x · Cited by 219
Cited by
Kyrdalen, I. L., Thingstad, P., Sandvik, L., & Ormstad, H. (2019) · Physiotherapy Research International · doi:10.1002/pri.1743 · Cited by 285
Metadata
- Authors
- Quach, L., Galica, A. M., Jones, R. N., Procter‐Gray, E., Manor, B., Hannan, M. T., & Lipsitz, L. A.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-06
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1069-1073
- ISSN
- 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-5415
- OpenAlex
- W1782471512
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 29.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Nonlinear Relationship Between Gait Speed and Falls: The Maintenance of Balance, Independent Living, Intellect, and Zest in the Elderly of Boston Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03408.x
- The paper
- Quach, L., Galica, A. M., Jones, R. N., Procter‐Gray, E., Manor, B., Hannan, M. T., & Lipsitz, L. A. (2011). The Nonlinear Relationship Between Gait Speed and Falls: The Maintenance of Balance, Independent Living, Intellect, and Zest in the Elderly of Boston Study. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03408.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.