Cited by 141Nutrition and Health in AgingBody Composition Measurement TechniquesClinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology

Prospective Validation of the Modified Mini Nutritional Assessment Short‐Forms in the Community, Nursing Home, and Rehabilitation Setting

Kaiser, Matthias J., Bauer, Jürgen M., Uter, Wolfgang, Donini, Lorenzo M., Stange, Inken, Volkert, Dorothee, Diekmann, Rebecca, Drey, Michael +5 more·2011·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

Objectives: To validate the modified Mini Nutritional Assessment ( MNA ) short‐forms ( MNA ‐ SFs ) with respect to agreement with full MNA classification in the target populations of the MNA . Design: Prospective analysis. Setting: Community, nursing home, rehabilitation. Participants: Six hundred fifty‐seven individuals aged 65 and older (75.3% female; mean age 82.3 ± 7.4). Measurements: Classification agreement between full MNA score and MNA ‐ SF scores. Results: Agreement between the full MNA and classification using the MNA ‐ SFs was 84.6% when the MNA ‐ SF using body mass index ( BMI ) was applied and 81.4% when the MNA ‐ SF using calf circumference ( CC ) was applied. The highest agreement of classification was found in the community setting (90.8% and 90.4%, respectively) and the lowest in the rehabilitation setting (72.4% and 71.4%, respectively). Both MNA ‐ SF s tended to underestimate nutritional status, but that was significant only for the MNA ‐ SF with CC . Conclusion: The modified MNA ‐ SF s represent a valuable tool for rapid and reliable nutritional screening.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03659.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ESPEN recommended the use of the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) in community settings, the Nutritional Risk Screening tool (NRS-2002) in clinical settings, and the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) for the elderly.

    “ESPEN recommended the use of the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) in community settings (48), the Nutritional Risk Screening tool (NRS-2002) in clinical settings (49), and the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) for the elderly (50).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kaiser, M. J., Bauer, J. M., Uter, W., Donini, L. M., Stange, I., Volkert, D., Diekmann, R., Drey, M., Bollwein, J., Tempera, S., Guerra, A., Ricciardi, L. M., & Sieber, C. C.
Affiliations
  • Institute for Biomedicine of Aging
  • Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
  • “Villa delle Querce” Rehabilitation Institute Rome Italy
Corresponding author
Kaiser, Matthias J.
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-09-21
Volume
59
Issue
11
Pages
2124-2128
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W1981356289
Cited by
141
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 6
FWCI
6.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
Keywords
Mini Nutritional Assessment, nutritional screening, nutritional assessment, older adults, nursing homes, rehabilitation, community-dwelling older adults, body mass index, calf circumference, classification agreement
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anthropometry, Female, Germany, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Male, Nursing Homes, Nutritional Status, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, ROC Curve, Geriatric Assessment, Nutrition Assessment, Body Mass Index, Incidence, Malnutrition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review