The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Age Changes in Prosocial Responding and Moral Reasoning in Adolescence and Early Adulthood
Open accessAbstract
Age changes' measures of prosocial responding and reasoning were examined. Participants' reports of helping, empathy‐related responding, and prosocial moral reasoning were obtained in adolescence (from age 15–16 years) and into adulthood (to age 25–26 years). Perspective taking and approval/interpersonal oriented/stereotypic prosocial moral reasoning increased from adolescence into adulthood, whereas personal distress declined. Helping declined and then increased (a cubic trend). Prosocial moral judgment composite scores (and self‐reflective empathic reasoning) generally increased from late adolescence into the early 20s (age 17–18 to 21–22) but either leveled off or declined slightly thereafter (i.e., showed linear and cubic trends); rudimentary needs‐oriented reasoning showed the reverse pattern of change. The increase in self‐reflective empathic moral reasoning was for females only. Thus, perspective taking and some aspects of prosocial moral reasoning—capacities with a strong sociocognitive basis—showed the clearest increases with age, whereas simple prosocial proclivities (i.e., helping, sympathy) did not increase with age.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach.
Davis, M. H. (1983) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113 · Cited by 10,272
Gender and helping behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature.
Eagly, A. H., & Crowley, M. (1986) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.100.3.283 · Cited by 1,068
Development of inhibitory control across the life span.
Williams, B. R., Ponesse, J. S., Schachar, R. J., Logan, G. D., & Tannock, R. (1999) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.35.1.205 · Cited by 889
Cited by
Neff, K. D., & Pommier, E. (2013) · Self and Identity · doi:10.1080/15298868.2011.649546 · Cited by 651
Decety, J., Michalska, K. J., Akitsuki, Y., & Lahey, B. B. (2009) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.09.004 · Cited by 287
Allemand, M., Steiger, A. E., & Fend, H. A. (2015) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/jopy.12098 · Cited by 270
Adolescent psychosocial development: A review of longitudinal models and research.
Meeus, W. (2016) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/dev0000243 · Cited by 264
Changing Brains, Changing Perspectives: The Neurocognitive Development of Reciprocity
van den Bos, W., van Dijk, E., Westenberg, M., Rombouts, S. A. R. B., & Crone, E. A. (2011) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797610391102 · Cited by 229
Metadata
- Authors
- Eisenberg, N., Cumberland, A., Guthrie, I. K., Murphy, B. C., & Shepard, S. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Research on Adolescence
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-08-12
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 235-260
- ISSN
- 1050-8392 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7795
- OpenAlex
- W2154837946
- Cited by
- 487
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 3.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Age Changes in Prosocial Responding and Moral Reasoning in Adolescence and Early Adulthood. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2005.00095.x
- The paper
- Eisenberg, N., Cumberland, A., Guthrie, I. K., Murphy, B. C., & Shepard, S. A. (2005). Age Changes in Prosocial Responding and Moral Reasoning in Adolescence and Early Adulthood. Journal of Research on Adolescence. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2005.00095.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.