Cited by 186Education Discipline and InequalityLegal Issues in EducationCrime Patterns and Interventions

School Discipline and Disruptive Classroom Behavior: The Moderating Effects of Student Perceptions

Way, Sandra M.·2011·The Sociological Quarterly

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between school discipline and student classroom behavior. A traditional deterrence framework predicts that more severe discipline will reduce misbehavior. In contrast, normative perspectives suggest that compliance depends upon commitment to rules and authority, including perceptions of fairness and legitimacy. Using school and individual-level data from the National Education Longitudinal Study of 1988 and multilevel regression modeling, the author finds support for the normative perspective. Students who perceive school authority as legitimate and teacher–student relations as positive are rated as less disruptive. While perceptions of fairness also predict lower disruptions, the effects are mediated by positive teacher–student relations. Contrary to the deterrence framework, more school rules and higher perceived strictness predicts more, not less, disruptive behavior. In addition, a significant interaction effect suggests that attending schools with more severe punishments may have the unintended consequence of generating defiance among certain youth.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01210.x

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Exposure to exclusionary discipline may lead students to distrust and feel defiant toward adults in their schools.

    “exposure to exclusionary discipline may lead students to distrust and feel defiant toward adults in their schools (Pesta, 2021; Way, 2011).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Way, S. M.
Affiliations
New Mexico State University (US)
Corresponding author
Way, Sandra M.
Venue
The Sociological Quarterly
Published
2011-08-01
Volume
52
Issue
3
Pages
346-375
ISSN
  • 0038-0253 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-8525
OpenAlex
W1553604944
Cited by
186
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 2
FWCI
21.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sociological Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Spencer Foundation
  • American Educational Research Association
  • Ardabil University of Medical Sciences
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Discipline and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Law › Legal Issues in Education
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
Keywords
student discipline, classroom disruption, student misbehavior, deterrence theory, normative theory, perceived fairness, perceived legitimacy, teacher-student relationship, school regulations, student perceptions, punishment in schools
MeSH terms
Authoritarianism, Faculty, Leadership, Punishment, Schools, Social Behavior Disorders, Social Perception, Students, United States, Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders, History, 20th Century

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review