Cited by 4Epilepsy research and treatmentDiet and metabolism studiesEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hyperventilation, More than Just Hot Air

Open access
Blume, Warren T.·2006·Epilepsy Currents

Abstract

Hyperventilation Revisited: Physiological Effects and Efficacy on Focal Seizure Activation in the Era of Video-EEG Monitoring Guaranha MS, Garzon E, Buchpiguel CA, Tazima S, Yacubian EM, Sakamoto AC Epilepsia 2005;46(1):69–75 Purpose Hyperventilation is an activation method that provokes physiological slowing of brain rhythms, interictal discharges, and seizures, especially in generalized idiopathic epilepsies. In this study, we assessed its effectiveness in inducing focal seizures during video-EEG monitoring. Methods We analyzed the effects of hyperventilation (HV) during video-EEG monitoring of patients with medically intractable focal epilepsies. We excluded children younger than 10 years, mentally retarded patients, and individuals with frequent seizures. Results We analyzed 97 patients; 24 had positive seizure activation (PSA), and 73 had negative seizure activation (NSA). No differences were found between groups regarding sex, age, age at epilepsy onset, duration of epilepsy, frequency of seizures, and etiology. Temporal lobe epilepsies were significantly more activated than frontal lobe epilepsies. Spontaneous and activated seizures did not differ in terms of their clinical characteristics, and the activation did not affect the performance of ictal single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Conclusions HV is a safe and effective method of seizure activation during monitoring. It does not modify any of the characteristics of the seizures and allows the obtaining of valuable ictal SPECTs. This observation is clinically relevant and suggests the effectiveness and the potential of HV in shortening the presurgical evaluation, especially of temporal lobe epilepsy patients, consequently reducing its costs and increasing the number of candidates for epilepsy surgery.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1535-7511.2006.00103.x

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Blume, W. T.
Corresponding author
Blume, Warren T.
Venue
Epilepsy Currents
Published
2006-05
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
76-77
ISSN
  • 1535-7511 (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7597
OpenAlex
W2057102876
Cited by
4
References
7
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Epiliepsy currents/Epilepsy currents (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Diet and metabolism studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Keywords
hyperventilation, focal epilepsy, video-EEG monitoring, temporal lobe epilepsy, frontal lobe epilepsy, ictal SPECT, preoperative assessment, epilepsy surgery candidates, interictal epileptiform discharges

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review