Cited by 3Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis MechanismsVasculitis and related conditions

Anti‐β2‐glycoprotein I antibody testing in the laboratory diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome

Open access
PENGO, V.·2005·Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2005.01444.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 17 · Cited by 3

Authors
PENGO, V.
Affiliations
University of Padua (IT)
Corresponding author
PENGO, V.
Venue
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-06
Volume
3
Issue
6
Pages
1158-1159
ISSN
1538-7836 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1565966142
Cited by
3
References
17
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Vasculitis and related conditions
Keywords
antiphospholipid syndrome, anti-beta2-glycoprotein I antibodies, lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibodies, thrombosis risk, autoantigen specificity, coagulation tests, ELISA, thrombosis risk stratification, autoimmunity, prothrombin
MeSH terms
Autoantibodies, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Glycoproteins, Humans, Sensitivity and Specificity, Antiphospholipid Syndrome, Clinical Laboratory Techniques, beta 2-Glycoprotein I

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review