Cited by 44Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchVasculitis and related conditionsBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms

Revised classification criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome and the thrombotic risk in patients with autoimmune diseases

Open access
SWADŹBA, J., IWANIEC, T., SZCZEKLIK, A., MUSIAŁ, J.·2007·Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis

Abstract

Background The classification criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) were updated in 2006.Objective The aim of the study was to analyze associations between clinical complications and laboratory test abnormalities typical for APS in a group of patients with autoimmune diseases, based on the recently updated criteria.Patients/methods Three hundred and thirty-six patients were enrolled into the study, with the majority (n = 235) suffering from systemic lupus erythematosus. Laboratory determinations included: lupus anticoagulant (LA), anticardiolipin (aCL) and anti-beta(2)-glycoprotein I (anti-beta(2)GPI) antibodies (ABs) [of both immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgM class].Results A significant association was found between laboratory and clinical features of APS; odds ratios (ORs) for thrombosis associated with the presence of LA, aCL, and anti-beta(2)GPI Abs were 4.04 [95% CI: 2.44-6.68], 3.71 (95% CI 2.32-5.92) and 2.57 (95% CI 1.60-4.1), respectively. Detailed analysis showed marked differences between the risk of clinical complications associated with the presence of an antibody in the IgG class (OR 4.15, 95% CI 2.42-7.12, and OR 4.77, 95% CI 2.37-9.61 for aCL and anti-beta(2)GPI, respectively) and in the IgM class (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.31-3.70, and OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.15-3.14 for aCL and anti-beta(2)GPI, respectively). The postulated inclusion of anti-beta(2)GPI antibody positivity into the previous laboratory criteria changed only slightly the number of patients diagnosed with APS (from 112 to 117).Conclusions The updated APS classification criteria clearly represent a step forward. However, our results argue against the use of overall positivity for aCL or anti-beta(2)GPI, and favor a clear distinction between the IgG and IgM classes of antiphospholipid ABs. Patients with both LA and anti-beta(2)GPI IgG or LA and aCL IgG positivity may represent the subgroups at the highest risk of thrombotic complications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2007.02669.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 38 · Cited by 44

Authors
SWADŹBA, J., IWANIEC, T., SZCZEKLIK, A., & MUSIAŁ, J.
Affiliations
Jagiellonian University (PL)
Corresponding author
MUSIAŁ, J.
Venue
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-09
Volume
5
Issue
9
Pages
1883-1889
ISSN
1538-7836 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1493977708
Cited by
44
References
38
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Vasculitis and related conditions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
Keywords
antiphospholipid syndrome, classification criteria, thrombosis, autoimmune disease, systemic lupus erythematosus, lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibodies, anti-beta2-glycoprotein I antibodies, thrombosis risk, laboratory abnormalities, medical complications
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Autoimmune Diseases, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Thrombosis, Antiphospholipid Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review