Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 269

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Two‐Event Model for Carcinogenesis: Biological, Mathematical, and Statistical Considerations

Moolgavkar, Suresh H., Luebeck, Georg·1990·Risk Analysis
DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1990.tb01053.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

A two‐mutation model for carcinogenesis is reviewed. General principles in fitting the model to epidemiologic and experimental data are discussed, and some examples are given. A general solution to the model with time‐dependent parameters is developed, and its use is illustrated by application to data from an experiment in which rats exposed to radon developed lung tumors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1990.tb01053.x

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 31 references

Metadata

Authors
Moolgavkar, S. H., & Luebeck, G.
Venue
Risk Analysis
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1990-06
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
323-341
ISSN
  • 0272-4332 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-6924
DOI
10.1111/j.1539-6924.1990.tb01053.x
OpenAlex
W1987787926
Cited by
269
References
31
FWCI
6.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Two‐Event Model for Carcinogenesis: Biological, Mathematical, and Statistical Considerations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1990.tb01053.x
The paper
Moolgavkar, S. H., & Luebeck, G. (1990). Two‐Event Model for Carcinogenesis: Biological, Mathematical, and Statistical Considerations. Risk Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1990.tb01053.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.