The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Errata
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The results demonstrated that no univariate measure can adequately describe the tumor response, although consideration of the concentration of particles with length > 20 μm provided the best correlation.”
From Quantification of short and long asbestos fibers to assess asbestos exposure: A review of fiber size toxicity (2014) · cites this paper as [63]
In the citing paper
“For both types, the carcinogenic potential increased with the length.”
From Quantification of short and long asbestos fibers to assess asbestos exposure: A review of fiber size toxicity (2014) · cites this paper as [63]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Boulanger, G., Andujar, P., Pairon, J.-C., Billon-Galland, M.-A., Dion, C., Dumortier, P., Brochard, P., Sobaszek, A., Bartsch, P., Paris, C., et al. (2014) · Environmental Health · doi:10.1186/1476-069x-13-59 · Cited by 176
Role of Mutagenicity in Asbestos Fiber-Induced Carcinogenicity and Other Diseases
Huang, S. X. L., Jaurand, M.-C., Kamp, D. W., Whysner, J., & Hei, T. K. (2011) · Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B · doi:10.1080/10937404.2011.556051 · Cited by 163
Case, B. W., Abraham, J. L., Meeker, G., Pooley, F. D., & Pinkerton, K. E. (2011) · Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B · doi:10.1080/10937404.2011.556045 · Cited by 123
Metadata
- Authors
- Berman, D. W.
- Venue
- Risk Analysis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-08
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 541-541
- ISSN
- 0272-4332
- 1539-6924
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
