The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Review of Risk Perceptions and Other Factors that Influence Flood Mitigation Behavior
Open accessAbstract
In flood risk management, a shift can be observed toward more integrated approaches that increasingly address the role of private households in implementing flood damage mitigation measures. This has resulted in a growing number of studies into the supposed positive relationship between individual flood risk perceptions and mitigation behavior. Our literature review shows, however, that, actually, this relationship is hardly observed in empirical studies. Two arguments are provided as an explanation. First, on the basis of protection motivation theory, a theoretical framework is discussed suggesting that individuals’ high‐risk perceptions need to be accompanied by coping appraisal to result in a protective response. Second, it is pointed out that possible feedback from already‐adopted mitigation measures on risk perceptions has hardly been considered by current studies. In addition, we also provide a review of factors that drive precautionary behavior other than risk perceptions. It is found that factors such as coping appraisal are consistently related to mitigation behavior. We conclude, therefore, that the current focus on risk perceptions as a means to explain and promote private flood mitigation behavior is not supported on either theoretical or empirical grounds.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Protection motivation and self-efficacy: A revised theory of fear appeals and attitude change
Maddux, J. E., & Rogers, R. W. (1983) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(83)90023-9 · Cited by 2,342
Cited by
Khosravi, K., Nohani, E., Maroufinia, E., & Pourghasemi, H. R. (2016) · Natural Hazards · doi:10.1007/s11069-016-2357-2 · Cited by 528
Sea-level rise and human migration
Hauer, M. E., Fussell, E., Mueller, V., Burkett, M., Call, M., Abel, K., McLeman, R., & Wrathall, D. (2019) · Nature Reviews Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43017-019-0002-9 · Cited by 426
Bockarjova, M., & Steg, L. (2014) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.010 · Cited by 401
Flood Risk in Urban Areas: Modelling, Management and Adaptation to Climate Change. A Review
Cea, L., & Costabile, P. (2022) · Hydrology · doi:10.3390/hydrology9030050 · Cited by 317
Lo, A. Y. (2013) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.019 · Cited by 266
Metadata
- Authors
- Bubeck, P., Botzen, W. J. W., & Aerts, J. C. J. H.
- Venue
- Risk Analysis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-03-06
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1481-1495
- ISSN
- 0272-4332 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-6924
- OpenAlex
- W2157782533
- Cited by
- 1,201
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 23.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Review of Risk Perceptions and Other Factors that Influence Flood Mitigation Behavior. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01783.x
- The paper
- Bubeck, P., Botzen, W. J. W., & Aerts, J. C. J. H. (2012). A Review of Risk Perceptions and Other Factors that Influence Flood Mitigation Behavior. Risk Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01783.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.