Cited by 98Probability and Risk ModelsStatistical Distribution Estimation and ApplicationsInsurance and Financial Risk Management

Number of Accidents or Number of Claims? An Approach with Zero‐Inflated Poisson Models for Panel Data

Boucher, Jean‐Philippe, Denuit, Michel, Guillen, Montserrat·2009·Journal of Risk and Insurance

Abstract

The hunger for bonus is a well‐known phenomenon in insurance, meaning that the insured does not report all of his accidents to save bonus on his next year's premium. In this article, we assume that the number of accidents is based on a Poisson distribution but that the number of claims is generated by censorship of this Poisson distribution. Then, we present new models for panel count data based on the zero‐inflated Poisson distribution. From the claims distributions, we propose an approximation of the accident distribution, which can provide insight into the behavior of insureds. A numerical illustration based on the reported claims of a Spanish insurance company is included to support this discussion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1539-6975.2009.01321.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Artis, M. , Ayuso, M. , and Guill´ en, M. (1999). Modelling different types of automobile insurance fraud behaviour in the Spanish market. Insurance Mathematics and Economics , 24(12):67-81.
  2. Boucher, J.-P. and Denuit, M. (2006). Fixed versus Random Effects in Poisson Regression Models for Claim Counts: Case Study with Motor Insurance. ASTIN Bulletin , 36:285-301.
  3. Boucher, J.-P. , Denuit, M. , and Guill´ en, M. (2007). Risk Classification for Claim Counts: A Comparative Analysis of Various Zero-Inflated Mixed Poisson and Hurdle Models. North American Actuarial Journal , 11-4:110-131.
  4. Boucher, J.-P. , Denuit, M. , and Guill´ en, M. (2008). Models of Insurance Claim Counts with Time Dependence Based on Generalisation of Poisson and Negative Binomial Distributions. Variance , 2 (1):135-162.
  5. Cameron, A. C. and Trivedi, P. K. (1998). Regression Analysis of Count Data . New York : Cambridge University Press.
  6. Denuit, M. , Mar´ echal, X. , Pitrebois, S. , and Walhin, J.-F. (2007). Actuarial Modelling of Claim Counts: Risk Classification, Credibility and Bonus-Malus Scales . Wiley: New York.
  7. Dionne, G. and Vanasse, C. (1989). A Generalization of Automobile Insurance Rating Models: The Negative Binomial Distribution with Regression Component. ASTIN Bulletin , 19:199-212.
  8. Dionne, G. and Vanasse, C. (1992). Automobile Insurance Ratemaking in the presence of asymmetrical information. Journal of Applied Econometrics , 7:149-165.
  9. Hinde, J. (1982). Compound Poisson Regression Models. in R. Gilchrist, ed., GLIM 82 : Proceeding of the International Conference on Generalised Linear Models, New York, Springer-Verlag .
  10. Hsiao, C. (2003). Analysis of Panel Data . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2nd ed.
  11. Lemaire, J. (1977). La Soif du Bonus. ASTIN Bulletin , 9:181-190.
  12. Lemaire, J. and Zi, H. (1994). A Comparative Analysis of 30 Bonus-Malus systems. ASTIN Bulletin , 24:287-309.
  13. Moran, P. (1971). Maximum Likelihood Estimation in Non-Standard Conditions. Proceeding of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , 70:441-450.
  14. Mullahy, J. (1986). Specification and Testing in some Modified Count Data Models. Journal of Econometrics , 33:341-365.
  15. Mullahy, J. (1997). Heterogeneity, Excess Zeros, and the Structure of Count Data Models. Journal of Applied Econometrics , 12(3):337-350.
  16. Philipson, C. (1960). The Swedish System of Bonus. ASTIN Bulletin , 1:134-141.
  17. Rivers, D. and Vuong, Q. (2002). Model Selection Tests for Nonlinear Dynamic Models. Econometrics Journal , 5:1-39.
  18. Shoukri, M. , Asyali, M. , VanDorp, R. , and Kelton, D. (2004). The Poisson Inverse Gaussian Regression Model in the Analysis of Clustered Counts Data. Journal of Data Science , 2:17-32.
  19. Walhin, J.-F. and Paris, J. (2000). The True Claim Amount and Frequency Distributions Within a Bonus-Malus System. ASTIN Bulletin , 30:391-403.
  20. Young, V. and De Vylder, F. (2000). Credibility in Favor of Unlucky Insureds. North American Actuarial Journal , 4:107-113.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boucher, J., Denuit, M., & Guillen, M.
Affiliations
  • Université du Québec à Montréal (CA)
  • UCLouvain (BE)
Venue
Journal of Risk and Insurance
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-11-06
Volume
76
Issue
4
Pages
821-846
ISSN
  • 0022-4367 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-6975
OpenAlex
W2025329530
Cited by
98
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
8.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Risk & Insurance (publishedVersion)
  • Archipel (Université du Québec à Montréal) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Probability and Risk Models
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Insurance and Financial Risk Management
Keywords
zero-inflated Poisson distribution, panel count data, insurance claims, underreporting of accidents, censorship, accident distribution, premium discounts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review