The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Social Amplification of Risk: Theoretical Foundations and Empirical Applications
Open accessAbstract
The social experience of risk is not confined to the technical definition of risk, i.e., the product of probability and magnitude. What human beings perceive as threats to their well‐being is influenced by their values, attitudes, social influences, and cultural identity. This article introduces the framework of social amplification of risk, which integrates the technical assessment and the social experience of risk. This viewpoint proposes that events pertaining to hazards interact with psychological, social, institutional, and cultural processes in ways that can heighten or attenuate individual and social perceptions of risk and shape risk behavior. An empirical study investigated the functional relationships among five sets of variables that enter into the amplification process: physical consequences, the amount of press coverage, individual layperson perceptions, public responses, and the socioeconomic and political impacts. It found that perceptions and social responses are more strongly related to exposure to risk than to its magnitude.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
Slovic, P. (1987) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3563507 · Cited by 9,271
Self-citation
Cited by
Anderson, A. A., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A., Xenos, M. A., & Ladwig, P. (2014) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/jcc4.12009 · Cited by 786
Klinke, A., & Renn, O. (2002) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/1539-6924.00274 · Cited by 668
Self-citationCurrent issues in the understanding of consumer food choice
Grunert, K. G. (2002) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/s0924-2244(02)00137-1 · Cited by 516
Comparative studies of risk perception: a review of twenty years of research
Boholm, A. (1998) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/136698798377231 · Cited by 465
Migration and Environmental Hazards
Hunter, L. M. (2005) · Population and Environment · doi:10.1007/s11111-005-3343-x · Cited by 411
Metadata
- Authors
- Renn, O., Burns, W. J., Kasperson, J. X., Kasperson, R. E., & Slovic, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Social Issues
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-01
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 137-160
- ISSN
- 0022-4537 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-4560
- OpenAlex
- W2024989079
- Cited by
- 534
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Social Amplification of Risk: Theoretical Foundations and Empirical Applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1992.tb01949.x
- The paper
- Renn, O., Burns, W. J., Kasperson, J. X., Kasperson, R. E., & Slovic, P. (1992). The Social Amplification of Risk: Theoretical Foundations and Empirical Applications. Journal of Social Issues. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1992.tb01949.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.