Resilience and Thriving: Issues, Models, and Linkages
Abstract
This article addresses distinctions underlying concepts of resilience and thriving and issues in conceptualizing thriving. Thriving (physical or psychological) may reflect decreased reactivity to subsequent stressors, faster recovery from subsequent stressors, or a consistently higher level of functioning. Psychological thriving may reflect gains in skill, knowledge, confidence, or a sense of security in personal relationships. Psychological thriving resembles other instances of growth. It probably does not depend on the occurrence of a discrete traumatic event or longer term trauma, though such events may elicit it. An important question is why some people thrive, whereas others are impaired, given the same event. A potential answer rests on the idea that differences in confidence and mastery are self-perpetuating and self-intensifying. This idea suggests a number of variables whose role in thriving is worth closer study, including personality variables such as optimism, contextual variables such as social support, and situational variables such as the coping reactions elicited by the adverse event.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Floundering, resilient, and thriving outcome trajectories of parentified youth may vary depending on social determinants (e.g., social supports, resources) and perceptions (e.g., fairness, benefits).
“Floundering, resilient, and thriving outcome trajectories of parentified youth may vary depending on social determinants (e.g., social supports, resources) and perceptions (e.g., fairness, benefits) [4].”
From Parentification Vulnerability, Reactivity, Resilience, and Thriving: A Mixed Methods Systematic Literature Review (2023) · cites this paper as [4]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 135 · Cited by 1,108
- Authors
- Carver, C. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Miami (US)
- Corresponding author
- Carver, Charles S.
- ORCID
- Carver, Charles S.
- Venue
- Journal of Social Issues
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-07
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 245-266
- ISSN
- 0022-4537 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-4560
- OpenAlex
- W2080570400
- Cited by
- 1,108
- References
- 135
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 92 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 61 · 2015: 53 · 2014: 55 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 43
- FWCI
- 9.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Social Issues (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
- Keywords
- resilience, stress recovery, posttraumatic growth, optimism, social support, coping, self-efficacy, personality differences, adverse events
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review