The Relationship Between Depth of Vocabulary Knowledge and L2 Learners’ Lexical Inferencing Strategy Use and Success
Abstract
This article is republished from The Canadian Modern Language Review, 61, 1, 2004, pp. 107–134. It is published as an article exchange between the MLJ and the CMLR. The articles for the exchange were selected by committees from the Editorial Board of each journal according to the following criteria: articles of particular relevance to international readers, especially those in the United States and Canada; and articles that are likely to provoke scholarly discussion among readers of the journal of their republication. The MLJ thanks Martha Nyikos, chair, Michael Everson, Richard Kern, and Peter Robinson for their work selecting this CMLR article for republication in the MLJ. The MLJ article “Testing the Development of French Word Knowledge by Advanced Dutch- and English-Speaking Learners and Native Speakers,” by Tine Greidanus, Bianca Beks, and Richard Wakely (MLJ, 89, 2005, pp. 221–233) appeared in CMLR 62, 2 ( June, 2006). The editors of both journals hope their readers will find this sharing of scholarship interesting and beneficial. This study examines the relationship between English as a second language (ESL) learners’ depth of vocabulary knowledge, their lexical inferencing strategy use, and their success in deriving word meaning from context. Participants read a passage containing 10 unknown words and attempted to derive the meanings of the unknown words from context. Introspective think-aloud protocols were used to discover the degree and types of inferencing strateg…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous research on adult foreign language learners has shown L2 lexical inferencing to be dependent on L2 vocabulary knowledge and L2 reading comprehension skills.
“Previous research on adult foreign language learners has shown L2 lexical inferencing to be dependent on L2 vocabulary knowledge and L2 reading comprehension skills (Elgort, Perfetti, Rickles, & Stafura, 2015;Elgort & Warren, 2014;Nassaji, 2006;Pulido, 2007).”
From Use of morphological and contextual cues in children’s lexical inferencing in L1 and L2 (2021) · cites this paper as Nassaji, 2006
Cites
Learning Vocabulary in Another Language
Nation, I. S. P. (2001) · Cambridge University Press · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139524759 · Cited by 6,608 · see citing works
Assessing the Roles of Depth and Breadth of Vocabulary Knowledge in Reading Comprehension
Qian, D. (1999) · The Canadian Modern Language Review · doi:10.3138/cmlr.56.2.282 · Cited by 536 · see citing works
Pulido, D. (2003) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/1467-9922.00217 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Review article: Instructed second language vocabulary learning
Schmitt, N. (2008) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168808089921 · Cited by 1,467 · see citing works
Eckerth, J., & Tavakoli, P. (2012) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168811431377 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
The effects of word exposure frequency on incidental learning of the depth of vocabulary knowledge
Teng, F. (2016) · GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies · doi:10.17576/gema-2016-1603-04 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Use of morphological and contextual cues in children’s lexical inferencing in L1 and L2
Raudszus, H., Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2021) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-021-10122-z · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“Previous research on adult foreign language learners has shown L2 lexical inferencing to be dependent on L2 vocabulary knowledge and L2 reading comprehension skills (Elgort, Perfetti, Rickles, & Stafura, 2015; Elgort & Warren, 2014; Nassaji, 2006; Pulido, 2007).”
Background
- Authors
- NASSAJI, H.
- Affiliations
- University of Victoria (CA)
- Corresponding author
- NASSAJI, HOSSEIN
- ORCID
- NASSAJI, HOSSEIN
- Venue
- The Modern Language Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-09
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 387-401
- ISSN
- 0026-7902 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-4781
- OpenAlex
- W2016045035
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 5.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Modern Language Journal (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Keywords
- lexical inferencing, depth of vocabulary knowledge, ESL learners, vocabulary acquisition, think-aloud, meaning-making
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review