The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Organizing for Radical Innovation: An Exploratory Study of the Structural Aspects of RI Management Systems in Large Established Firms
Abstract
To escape the intense competition of today's global economy, large established organizations seek growth options beyond conventional new product development that leads to incremental changes in current product lines. Radical innovation (RI) is one such pathway, which results in organically driven growth through the creation of whole new lines of business that bring new to the world performance features to the market and may result in the creation of entirely new markets. Yet success is elusive, as many have experienced and scholars have documented. This article reports results of a three‐year, longitudinal study of 12 large established firms that have declared a strategic intent to evolve their RI capabilities. In contrast to other academic research that has analyzed specific projects to understand management practices appropriate for RI, the present research reported explores the evolution of management systems for enabling radical innovation to occur repeatedly in large firms and reports on one aspect of this management system: organizational structures for enabling and nurturing RI. To consider organizational structure as a venue for capability development is new in the management of innovation and dynamic capabilities literatures. Conventional wisdom holds that RIs should be incubated outside the company and assimilated once they have gained traction in the marketplace. Numerous experiments with organizational structures were observed that instead work to manage the interfaces between the RI management system and the mother organization. These structures are described here, and insights are drawn out regarding radical innovation competency requirements, transition challenges, senior leadership mandates, and business‐unit ambidexterity. The centerpiece of this research is the explication of the Discovery–Incubation–Acceleration framework, which details three sets of necessary, though not sufficient competencies, for building an RI capability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Building Theories from Case Study Research
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258557 · Cited by 17,455
Hartley, J. (2004) · Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research · doi:10.4135/9781446280119.n26 · Cited by 15,461
Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development
Leonard-Barton, D. (1992) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250131009 · Cited by 6,477
Cited by
Organizational Ambidexterity: Towards a Multilevel Understanding
Simsek, Z. (2009) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00828.x · Cited by 830
Organizational Culture and Innovation: A Meta‐Analytic Review
Büschgens, T., Bausch, A., & Balkin, D. B. (2013) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12021 · Cited by 649
Sarooghi, H., Libaers, D., & Burkemper, A. (2015) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.12.003 · Cited by 484
Corporate foresight: Its three roles in enhancing the innovation capacity of a firm
Rohrbeck, R., & Gemünden, H. G. (2011) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2010.06.019 · Cited by 321
Perspective: State‐of‐the‐Art: The Quality of Case Study Research in Innovation Management
Goffin, K., Åhlström, P., Bianchi, M., & Richtnér, A. (2019) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12492 · Cited by 265
Metadata
- Authors
- O'Connor, G. C., & DeMartino, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Product Innovation Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-10-20
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 475-497
- ISSN
- 0737-6782 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-5885
- OpenAlex
- W2077037957
- Cited by
- 412
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 34.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Organizing for Radical Innovation: An Exploratory Study of the Structural Aspects of RI Management Systems in Large Established Firms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2006.00219.x
- The paper
- O'Connor, G. C., & DeMartino, R. (2006). Organizing for Radical Innovation: An Exploratory Study of the Structural Aspects of RI Management Systems in Large Established Firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2006.00219.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.