The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Mechanisms of Policy Diffusion
Abstract
Local policy adoptions provide an excellent opportunity to test among potential mechanisms of policy diffusion. By examining three types of antismoking policy choices by the 675 largest U.S. cities between 1975 and 2000, we uncover robust patterns of policy diffusion, yielding three key findings. First, we distinguish among and find evidence for four mechanisms of policy diffusion: learning from earlier adopters, economic competition among proximate cities, imitation of larger cities, and coercion by state governments. Second, we find a temporal component to these effects, with imitation being a more short‐lived diffusion process than the others. Third, we show that these mechanisms are conditional, with larger cities being better able to learn from others, less fearful of economic spillovers, and less likely to rely on imitation .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Agendas and instability in American politics
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.31-0574 · Cited by 5,943
Taking Time Seriously: Time-Series-Cross-Section Analysis with a Binary Dependent Variable
Beck, N. L., Katz, J. N., & Tucker, R. P. (1998) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2991857 · Cited by 2,443
Sullivan, L. E. (2009) · The SAGE Glossary of the Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.4135/9781412972024.n747 · Cited by 2,442
The Diffusion of Innovations among the American States
Walker, J. L. (1969) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055400258644 · Cited by 2,357
The Evolution of E‐Government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality?
Moon, M. J. (2002) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/0033-3352.00196 · Cited by 1,984
Regression analysis of multivariate incomplete failure time data by modeling marginal distributions
Wei, L. J., Lin, D. Y., & Weissfeld, L. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1989.10478873 · Cited by 1,868
Hinkemeyer, M. T. (1971) · The Clearing House A Journal of Educational Strategies Issues and Ideas · doi:10.1080/00098655.1971.11478291 · Cited by 1,852
State Lottery Adoptions as Policy Innovations: An Event History Analysis
Berry, F. S., & Berry, W. D. (1990) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1963526 · Cited by 1,689
Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States, 1960-93
Berry, W. D., Ringquist, E. J., Fording, R. C., & Hanson, R. L. (1998) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2991759 · Cited by 1,593
Peterson, P. E. (1981) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226922645.001.0001 · Cited by 1,589
Policy Entrepreneurs and the Diffusion of Innovation
Mintrom, M. (1997) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2111674 · Cited by 1,285
Innovation in the States: A Diffusion Study
Gray, V. H. (1973) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1956539 · Cited by 1,150
Introduction: The International Diffusion of Liberalism
Simmons, B. A., Dobbin, F. R., & Garrett, G. (2006) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818306060267 · Cited by 1,147
Huber, J. D., & Shipan, C. R. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804915 · Cited by 896
Self-citationBottom‐Up Federalism: The Diffusion of Antismoking Policies from U.S. Cities to States
Shipan, C. R., & Volden, C. (2006) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00218.x · Cited by 616
Self-citationStates as Policy Laboratories: Emulating Success in the Children's Health Insurance Program
Volden, C. (2006) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00185.x · Cited by 581
Self-citationTheories of Policy Diffusion Lessons from Latin American Pension Reform
Weyland, K. (2005) · World Politics · doi:10.1353/wp.2005.0019 · Cited by 576
Legislative Morality in the American States: The Case of Pre-Roe Abortion Regulation Reform
Mooney, C. Z., & Lee, M. (1995) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2111646 · Cited by 522
Pralle, S. B. (2003) · Journal of Public Policy · doi:10.1017/s0143814x03003118 · Cited by 424
Boehmke, F. J., & Witmer, R. (2004) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/106591290405700104 · Cited by 310
Interstate Professional Associations and the Diffusion of Policy Innovations
Balla, S. J. (2001) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/1532673x01293001 · Cited by 303
Legislatures and Statutory Control of Bureaucracy
Huber, J. D., Shipan, C. R., & Pfahler, M. (2001) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2669344 · Cited by 284
Self-citationDo Workplace Smoking Bans Reduce Smoking?
Evans, W. N., Farrelly, M. C., & Montgomery, E. E., IV (1999) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.89.4.728 · Cited by 279
Using Geographic Information Systems to Study Interstate Competition
Berry, W. D., & Baybeck, B. (2005) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055405051841 · Cited by 270
Interdependence in Comparative Politics
Franzese, R. J., & Hays, J. C. (2008) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414007313122 · Cited by 234
Duration Models for Repeated Events
Box‐Steffensmeier, J. M., & Zorn, C. (2002) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1111/1468-2508.00163 · Cited by 221
The Impact of Federal Incentives on State Policy Innovation
Welch, S., & Thompson, K. (1980) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2110955 · Cited by 211
The Politics of Competitive Federalism: A Race to the Bottom in Welfare Benefits?
Volden, C. (2002) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/3088381 · Cited by 208
Self-citationHaider‐Markel, D. P. (2001) · State Politics & Policy Quarterly · doi:10.1177/153244000100100102 · Cited by 195
Plotnick, R. D., Peterson, P. E., & Rom, M. C. (1992) · Industrial and Labor Relations Review · doi:10.1177/001979399204500223 · Cited by 190
The Spread of Municipal Reform: Temporal, Spatial, and Social Dynamics
Knoke, D. (1982) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/227595 · Cited by 182
A Wider Race? Interstate Competition across Health and Welfare Programs
Bailey, M. A., & Rom, M. C. (2004) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2004.00154.x · Cited by 167
Tobacco lobby political influence on US state legislatures in the 1990s
Givel, M. S., & Glantz, S. A. (2001) · Tobacco Control · doi:10.1136/tc.10.2.124 · Cited by 166
Tobacco Control in the Wake of the 1998 Master Settlement Agreement
Schroeder, S. A. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsr031421 · Cited by 160
Allen, M. D., Pettus, C., & Haider-Markel, D. P. (2004) · State Politics & Policy Quarterly · doi:10.1177/153244000400400304 · Cited by 157
Bounded Rationality and Policy Diffusion
Weyland, K. (2009) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400828067 · Cited by 154
Godwin, M. L., & Schroedel, J. R. (2000) · Policy Studies Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2000.tb02061.x · Cited by 150
Buckley, J., & Westerland, C. (2004) · State Politics & Policy Quarterly · doi:10.1177/153244000400400105 · Cited by 126
Intergovernmental Political Competition in American Federalism
Volden, C. (2005) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00126.x · Cited by 124
Self-citationScalla, A. (1994) · Journal of Supreme Court History · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5818.1994.tb00019.x · Cited by 120
Fluoridation: The Diffusion of an Innovation among Cities
Crain, R. L. (1966) · Social Forces · doi:10.1093/sf/44.4.467 · Cited by 109
National Intervention and the Diffusion of Policy Innovations
Karch, A. (2006) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/1532673x06288202 · Cited by 109
Martin, I. W. (2001) · Urban Affairs Review · doi:10.1177/10780870122184966 · Cited by 100
The Indirect Effect of Direct Legislation : How Institutions Shape Interest Group Systems
Boehmke, F. J. (2005) · Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) · Cited by 93
The Changing Structure of American Cities: A Study of the Diffusion of Innovation
Frederickson, H. G., Johnson, G. A., & Wood, C. (2004) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00376.x · Cited by 93
Tourism and Hotel Revenues Before and After Passage of Smoke-Free Restaurant Ordinances
Glantz, S. A. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.281.20.1911 · Cited by 91
Comment: Problems in Research on the Diffusion of Policy Innovations
Walker, J. L. (1973) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1956540 · Cited by 90
Learning and economic policy choices
Meseguer, C. (2005) · European Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2005.06.002 · Cited by 86
Siegel, M. (1997) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.278.10.858 · Cited by 85
Mooney, C. Z., & Lee, M. (1999) · Policy Studies Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.1999.tb02002.x · Cited by 85
Variations in Elite Perceptions of American States as Referents for Public Policy Making
Grupp, F. W., & Richards, A. R. (1975) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1958394 · Cited by 80
The State-Local Nexus in Policy Innovation Diffusion: The Case of School Choice
Mintrom, M. (1997) · Publius The Journal of Federalism · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a029927 · Cited by 76
The Effect of Public Policies and Prices on Youth Smoking
Ross, H., & Chaloupka, F. J. (2004) · Southern Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/4135273 · Cited by 72
Volden, C. (2007) · Publius The Journal of Federalism · doi:10.1093/publius/pjl022 · Cited by 70
Self-citationTobacco Control Laws: Implementation and Enforcement
Jacobson, P., & Wasserman, J. (1997) · Cited by 58
Skeer, M. R., George, S., Hamilton, W. L., Cheng, D. M., & Siegel, M. (2004) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.94.2.286 · Cited by 56
Whose Ear to Bend? Information Sources and Venue Choice in Policy-Making
Boehmke, F. J., Gailmard, S., & Patty, J. W. (2006) · Quarterly Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1561/100.00000003 · Cited by 51
State tobacco lobbyists and organizations in the United States: crossed lines.
Goldstein, A. O., & Bearman, N. S. (1996) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.86.8_pt_1.1137 · Cited by 37
The Status of Local Smoking Regulations in North Carolina Following a State Preemption Bill
Conlisk, E. (1995) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03520340061037 · Cited by 23
Andersen, B. S., Begay, M. E., & Lawson, C. B. (2003) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.93.11.1922 · Cited by 14
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Brandeis Louis Dembitz, 1932, Dissenting Opinion, New State Ice Co. v. Liebmann
- Chriqui Jamie F., 2000, Restricting Minors' Access to Tobacco Products: An Examination of State Legislation and Policy Innovation
- 10.1001/jama.273.10.805 · DOI
- 10.2307/2575080 · DOI
- Peterson Paul E., 1990, Welfare Magnets: A New Case for a National Standard
- Purlee Scott, 1995, Driving Influences: Operators Now Use Travel Time to Tally Potential Customers, Restaurants and Institutions, 105, 33
- 10.1002/j.2325-8012.2004.tb00605.x · DOI
- Tanyeri Dana, 2007, So Who Is Your Customer Anyway?, Restaurant Business, 106, 26
- 10.2307/1954434 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
HTUN, M., & WELDON, S. L. (2012) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055412000226 · Cited by 652
Transfer and translation of policy
Stone, D. (2012) · Policy Studies · doi:10.1080/01442872.2012.695933 · Cited by 651
Liang, F., Das, V., Kostyuk, N., & Hussain, M. M. (2018) · Policy & Internet · doi:10.1002/poi3.183 · Cited by 617
Who Learns from What in Policy Diffusion Processes?
Gilardi, F. (2010) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00452.x · Cited by 578
Policy Diffusion: Seven Lessons for Scholars and Practitioners
Shipan, C. R., & Volden, C. (2012) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02610.x · Cited by 540
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Shipan, C. R., & Volden, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Shipan, Charles R.
- Volden, Craig
- Venue
- American Journal of Political Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-09-29
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 840-857
- ISSN
- 0092-5853 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-5907
- OpenAlex
- W1986486185
- Cited by
- 1,369
- References
- 63
- Citations by year
- 2026: 133 · 2025: 114 · 2024: 103 · 2023: 104 · 2022: 94 · 2021: 130 · 2020: 94 · 2019: 96 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 68 · 2016: 75 · 2015: 81 · 2014: 57 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 40
- FWCI
- 142.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Political Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policy Transfer and Learning
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
- Keywords
- policy diffusion, anti-smoking policy, smoking bans, cities, market competition, imitation, state coercion, city size, diffusion mechanism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
