Cited by 375Military History and StrategyPolitical Conflict and GovernanceTerrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence

Aerial Bombing and Counterinsurgency in the Vietnam War: BOMBING AND COUNTERINSURGENCY IN VIETNAM

Kocher, Matthew Adam, Pepinsky, Thomas B., Kalyvas, Stathis N.·2011·American Journal of Political Science

Abstract

Aerial bombardment has been an important component of counterinsurgency practice since shortly after it became a viable military technology in the early twentieth century. Due to the nature of insurgency, bombing frequently occurs in and around settled areas, and consequently it tends to generate many civilian casualties. However, the effectiveness of bombing civilian areas as a military tactic remains disputed. Using data disaggregated to the level of the smallest population unit and measured at multiple points in time, this article examines the effect of aerial bombardment on the pattern of local control in the Vietnam War. A variety of estimation methods, including instrumental variables and genetic matching, show that bombing civilians systematically shifted control in favor of the Viet Cong insurgents.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00498.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Kocher, Pepinsky and Kalyvas (2011) find that villages hit by US airstrikes were more likely to come under the influence of Vietcong.

    “Using evidence from the Vietnam War, Kocher, Pepinsky and Kalyvas (2011) find that those villages that were hit by US airstrikes were more likely to come under the influence of Vietcong.”

    From Dynamics and Logics of Civil War (2017) · cites this paper as Kocher, Pepinsky and Kalyvas (2011)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kocher, M. A., Pepinsky, T. B., & Kalyvas, S. N.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Cornell University (US)
Venue
American Journal of Political Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-02-01
Volume
55
Issue
2
Pages
201-218
ISSN
0092-5853 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2102303177
Cited by
375
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 14
FWCI
121.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Journal of Political Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Military History and Strategy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Keywords
aerial bombing, counterinsurgency, Vietnam War, civilian casualties, local control, Viet Cong, insurgency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review