CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 262Public Policy and Administration ResearchPublic Administration and Political AnalysisPublic Administration and Governance

Introduction to the Symposium on Collaborative Public Management

O‘Leary, Rosemary, Gerard, Catherine, Bingham, Lisa Blomgren·2006·Public Administration Review
DOI 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00661.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00661.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
O‘Leary, R., Gerard, C., & Bingham, L. B.
Affiliations
  • Syracuse University (US)
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Corresponding author
  • Gerard, Catherine
  • Bingham, Lisa Blomgren
ORCID
Bingham, Lisa Blomgren
Venue
Public Administration Review
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-11-09
Volume
66
Issue
s1
Pages
6-9
ISSN
  • 0033-3352 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-6210
DOI
10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00661.x
OpenAlex
W1983391048
Cited by
262
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 17
FWCI
41.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
Public Administration Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration and Political Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration and Governance
Keywords
collaborative public management, public sector management, public sector reform

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review