Cited by 933Public Policy and Administration ResearchPublic Administration and Political AnalysisPublic Administration and Governance

Collaborative Public Management: Assessing What We Know and How We Know It

McGuire, Michael·2006·Public Administration Review

Abstract

Collaborative public management research is flourishing. A great deal of attention is being paid to the process and impact of collaboration in the public sector, and the results are promising. This article reviews the literature on collaborative public management by synthesizing what we know from recent research and what we’ve known for quite some time. It addresses the prevalence of collaboration (both recently and historically), the components of emerging collaborative structures, the types of skills that are unique to collaborative management, and the effects of collaboration. Collaborative public management research offers a set of findings that contribute to an emerging knowledge base that supplements established public management theory.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00664.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McGuire, M.
Affiliations
Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Corresponding author
McGuire, Michael
Venue
Public Administration Review
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-11-09
Volume
66
Issue
s1
Pages
33-43
ISSN
  • 0033-3352 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-6210
OpenAlex
W2088641112
Cited by
933
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 62 · 2017: 64 · 2016: 68 · 2015: 56 · 2014: 62 · 2013: 64 · 2012: 49
FWCI
74.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Public Administration Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration and Political Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration and Governance
Keywords
collaborative public management, collaborative structures, teamwork skills, public management theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review