Collaborative Public Management: Assessing What We Know and How We Know It
Abstract
Collaborative public management research is flourishing. A great deal of attention is being paid to the process and impact of collaboration in the public sector, and the results are promising. This article reviews the literature on collaborative public management by synthesizing what we know from recent research and what we’ve known for quite some time. It addresses the prevalence of collaboration (both recently and historically), the components of emerging collaborative structures, the types of skills that are unique to collaborative management, and the effects of collaboration. Collaborative public management research offers a set of findings that contribute to an emerging knowledge base that supplements established public management theory.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
The Competent Boundary Spanner
Williams, P. (2002) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/1467-9299.00296 · Cited by 1,311 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance
Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mur011 · Cited by 3,637 · see citing works
Collaborative data networks for public service: governance, management, and performance
Chen, Y.-C., & Lee, J. (2018) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2017.1305691 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Wright, N. S., & Reames, T. G. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12124986 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
- Authors
- McGuire, M.
- Affiliations
- Indiana University Bloomington (US)
- Corresponding author
- McGuire, Michael
- ORCID
- McGuire, Michael
- Venue
- Public Administration Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-11-09
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- s1
- Pages
- 33-43
- ISSN
- 0033-3352 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-6210
- OpenAlex
- W2088641112
- Cited by
- 933
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 62 · 2017: 64 · 2016: 68 · 2015: 56 · 2014: 62 · 2013: 64 · 2012: 49
- FWCI
- 74.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Public Administration Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration and Political Analysis
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration and Governance
- Keywords
- collaborative public management, collaborative structures, teamwork skills, public management theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review