The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Standardizing the World Income Inequality Database*
Abstract
Objective. Cross‐national research on the causes and consequences of income inequality has been hindered by the limitations of existing inequality data sets: greater coverage across countries and over time is available from these sources only at the cost of significantly reduced comparability across observations. The goal of the Standardized World Income Inequality Database (SWIID) is to overcome these limitations. Methods. A custom missing‐data algorithm was used to standardize the U.N. University's World Income Inequality Database; data collected by the Luxembourg Income Study served as the standard. Results. The SWIID provides comparable Gini indices of gross and net income inequality for 153 countries for as many years as possible from 1960 to the present, along with estimates of uncertainty in these statistics. Conclusions. By maximizing comparability for the largest possible sample of countries and years, the SWIID is better suited to broad cross‐national research on income inequality than previously available sources.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Rational Theory of the Size of Government
Meltzer, A. H., & Richard, S. F. (1981) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261013 · Cited by 5,485
Analyzing Incomplete Political Science Data: An Alternative Algorithm for Multiple Imputation
King, G., Honaker, J., Joseph, A., & Scheve, K. (2001) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055401000235 · Cited by 1,834
Cited by
A good life for all within planetary boundaries
O’Neill, D. W., Fanning, A. L., Lamb, W. F., & Steinberger, J. K. (2018) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-018-0021-4 · Cited by 1,452
The Standardized World Income Inequality Database*
Solt, F. (2016) · Social Science Quarterly · doi:10.1111/ssqu.12295 · Cited by 1,030
Self-citationFincher, C. L., & Thornhill, R. (2012) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x11000021 · Cited by 530
Finance and income inequality: A review and new evidence
de Haan, J., & Sturm, J.-E. (2017) · European Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2017.04.007 · Cited by 465
Financial development and income inequality: a panel data approach
Jauch, S., & Watzka, S. (2016) · Empirical Economics · doi:10.1007/s00181-015-1008-x · Cited by 372
Metadata
- Authors
- Solt, F.
- Venue
- Social Science Quarterly
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-04-13
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 231-242
- ISSN
- 0038-4941 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-6237
- OpenAlex
- W2144140979
- Cited by
- 953
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 119.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Standardizing the World Income Inequality Database*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2009.00614.x
- The paper
- Solt, F. (2009). Standardizing the World Income Inequality Database*. Social Science Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2009.00614.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.