The DOI matches its Crossref record.
THE I-CHING AND THE FORMATION OF THE HUA-YEN PHILOSOPHY
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As seen in Figure 1, the mutual interfusion between Thusness and nescience represents a state, in which truth and delusion, are intricately interconnected to constitute ālayavijñāna.”
From On the Ālayavijñāna in the Awakening of Faith: Comparing and Contrasting Wŏnhyo and Fazang’s Views on Tathāgatagarbha and Ālayavijñāna (2019) · cites this paper as Lai (1980, p. 252)
Citations
Cited by
Lee, S. (2019) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel10090536 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- LAI, W.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois System (US)
- Corresponding author
- LAI, WHALEN
- Venue
- Journal of Chinese Philosophy
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 1980-09
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 245-258
- ISSN
- 0301-8121 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-6253
- OpenAlex
- W2141107300
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Chinese Philosophy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
- Keywords
- Book of Changes, Huayan Buddhism, Chinese philosophy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
