Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,254

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

On the Determinants of Corporate Hedging

NANCE, DEANA R., SMITH, CLIFFORD W., SMITHSON, CHARLES W.·1993·The Journal of Finance

Abstract

Finance theory indicates that hedging increases firm value by reducing expected taxes, expected costs of financial distress, or other agency costs. This paper provides evidence on these hypotheses using survey data on firm's use of forwards, futures, swaps, and options combined with COMPUTSTAT data on firm characteristics. Of 169 firms in the sample, 104 firms use hedging instruments in 1986. The data suggest that firms which hedge face more convex tax functions, have less coverage of fixed claims, are larger, have more growth options in their investment opportunity set, and employ fewer hedging substitutes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb04709.x

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Cited by

See all 1,254

Metadata

Authors
NANCE, D. R., SMITH, C. W., & SMITHSON, C. W.
Venue
The Journal of Finance
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1993-03
Volume
48
Issue
1
Pages
267-284
ISSN
  • 0022-1082 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-6261
OpenAlex
W2119520917
Cited by
1,254
References
15
FWCI
57.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the Determinants of Corporate Hedging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb04709.x
The paper
NANCE, D. R., SMITH, C. W., & SMITHSON, C. W. (1993). On the Determinants of Corporate Hedging. The Journal of Finance. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb04709.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.