Cited by 2,384Monetary Policy and Economic ImpactFinancial Markets and Investment StrategiesMarket Dynamics and Volatility

What explains the stock market’s reaction to federal reserve policy?

Open access
BERNANKE, BEN S., KUTTNER, KENNETH N.·2005·The Journal of Finance

Abstract

This paper analyzes the impact of changes in monetary policy on equity prices, with the objectives of both measuring the average reaction of the stock market and understanding the economic sources of that reaction. We find that, on average, a hypothetical unanticipated 25‐basis‐point cut in the Federal funds rate target is associated with about a 1% increase in broad stock indexes. Adapting a methodology due to Campbell and Ammer, we find that the effects of unanticipated monetary policy actions on expected excess returns account for the largest part of the response of stock prices.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00760.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Stock market valuation increases in response to an interest rate cut.

    “Bernanke and Kuttner (2005) which documents how stock market valuation increases in response to an interest rate cut.”

    From Threats to central bank independence: High-frequency identification with twitter (2023) · cites this paper as Bernanke and Kuttner (2005)

  • The estimated stock market effects are about four times smaller than estimates in Bernanke and Kuttner (2005) and Swanson (2021).

    “In terms of economic magnitudes, the estimated effects are about four times smaller than the estimates in Bernanke and Kuttner (2005) and Swanson (2021).”

    From Threats to central bank independence: High-frequency identification with twitter (2023) · cites this paper as Bernanke and Kuttner (2005)

  • Surprise interest rate cuts increase stock market valuations.

    “The positive response of the stock market to an interest rate cut is consistent with the evidence from Bernanke and Kuttner (2005) who find that surprise interest rate cuts increase stock market valuations.”

    From Threats to central bank independence: High-frequency identification with twitter (2023) · cites this paper as Bernanke and Kuttner (2005)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
BERNANKE, B. S., & KUTTNER, K. N.
Affiliations
Princeton University (US)
Venue
The Journal of Finance
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-05-03
Volume
60
Issue
3
Pages
1221-1257
ISSN
  • 0022-1082 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-6261
OpenAlex
W2165100677
Cited by
2,384
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 141 · 2025: 196 · 2024: 167 · 2023: 146 · 2022: 149 · 2021: 146 · 2020: 137 · 2019: 121 · 2018: 114 · 2017: 123 · 2016: 120 · 2015: 104 · 2014: 117 · 2013: 122 · 2012: 106
FWCI
83.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
The Journal of Finance (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Market Dynamics and Volatility
Keywords
Federal Reserve policy, monetary policy, stock market reaction, stock prices, federal funds rate, expected excess returns, stock index returns

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review