The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Executive Financial Incentives and Payout Policy: Firm Responses to the 2003 Dividend Tax Cut
Abstract
We test whether executive stock ownership affects firm payouts using the 2003 dividend tax cut to identify an exogenous change in the after‐tax value of dividends. We find that executives with higher ownership were more likely to increase dividends after the tax cut in 2003, whereas no relation is found in periods when the dividend tax rate was higher. Relative to previous years, firms that initiated dividends in 2003 were more likely to reduce repurchases. The stock price reaction to the tax cut suggests that the substitution of dividends for repurchases may have been anticipated, consistent with agency conflicts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Farre-Mensa, J., Michaely, R., & Schmalz, M. (2014) · Annual Review of Financial Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev-financial-110613-034259 · Cited by 224
The cost of financial flexibility: Evidence from share repurchases
Bonaimé, A. A., Hankins, K. W., & Jordan, B. D. (2016) · Journal of Corporate Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.02.002 · Cited by 68
Metadata
- Authors
- BROWN, J. R., LIANG, N., & WEISBENNER, S.
- Venue
- The Journal of Finance
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-08
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1935-1965
- ISSN
- 0022-1082 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-6261
- OpenAlex
- W2144879307
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 68.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.