The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparing Innovation Capability of Small and Medium‐Sized Enterprises: Examining the Effects of Organizational Culture and Empowerment
Open accessAbstract
This study analyzes the impact of organizational culture and empowerment on innovation capability, and examines the peculiarities of these effects. The study's hypotheses are tested by applying both individual and firm-level analyses to survey data collected from 743 employees from 93 small and medium-sized firms located in Turkey. For medium-sized enterprises on both the individual and firm level of analysis, results suggest that collectivism and uncertainty avoidance are positively associated with empowerment, whereas power distance is negatively related to empowerment. Assertiveness focus has no relations with empowerment and innovation capability, yet among cultural dimensions, only uncertainty avoidance is related to innovation capability. For small-sized enterprises, findings suggest that both power distance and uncertainty avoidance are linked to both empowerment and innovation capability on the individual level, whereas two new paths between collectivism and innovation capability and between assertiveness focus and empowerment are found on the firm level. Also, empowerment is found to be positively related to innovation capability for both small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) on both the individual and firm level. In terms of managerial practice, our study helps clarify the key role played by cultural dimensions in the process of shaping an empowering and innovative work environment. Findings also reveal that managers should focus on participative managerial practices (e.g., empowerment) to promote innovation capability of SMEs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920638601200408 · Cited by 17,102
Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.3.383 · Cited by 12,939 · cited 1×
“Accordingly, the firm’s innovation capability is its ability to mobilize the knowledge, possessed by its employees (Kogut and Zander 1992), and combine it to create new knowledge, resulting in product and/or process innovation.”
BackgroundEssentials of Psychological Testing
Urbina, S. (2014) · doi:10.1002/9781394259458 · Cited by 1,845
Understanding the influence of national culture on the development of trust
Doney, P. M., Cannon, J. P., & Mullen, M. R. (1998) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259297 · Cited by 1,844
Impact of Culture on Human Resource Management Practices: A 10‐Country Comparison
Aycan, Z., Kanungo, R., Mendonca, M., Yu, K., Deller, J., Stahl, G., & Kurshid, A. (2000) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/1464-0597.00010 · Cited by 786
Implicating trust in the innovation process†
Clegg, C., Unsworth, K., Epitropaki, O., & Parker, G. (2002) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1348/096317902321119574 · Cited by 289 · cited 1×
“Further, in their individual-level study, Clegg et al. (2002) suggested that trust and effective communication between organizational members better facilitate the management of organizational innovation process.”
Background
Cited by
Digital technologies and firm performance: The role of digital organisational culture
Martínez-Caro, E., Cegarra-Navarro, J. G., & Alfonso-Ruiz, F. J. (2020) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119962 · Cited by 710
Organizational Culture and Innovation: A Meta‐Analytic Review
Büschgens, T., Bausch, A., & Balkin, D. B. (2013) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12021 · Cited by 649
Naqshbandi, M. M., & Tabche, I. (2018) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.03.017 · Cited by 308
Liu, Y., Chan, C., Zhao, C., & Liu, C. (2019) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/jkm-07-2017-0260 · Cited by 94
Metadata
- Authors
- Çakar, N. D., & Ertürk, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Small Business Management
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-07
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 325-359
- ISSN
- 0047-2778 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-627X
- OpenAlex
- W1548973241
- Cited by
- 378
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 42.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparing Innovation Capability of Small and Medium‐Sized Enterprises: Examining the Effects of Organizational Culture and Empowerment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1540-627x.2010.00297.x
- The paper
- Çakar, N. D., & Ertürk, A. (2010). Comparing Innovation Capability of Small and Medium‐Sized Enterprises: Examining the Effects of Organizational Culture and Empowerment. Journal of Small Business Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627x.2010.00297.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.