Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 0 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Kepler and Witchcraft Trials

Rosen, Edward·1966·The Historian

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1540-6563.1966.tb01751.x

Cites

0 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 1 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

  • Untitled work

    Kepler (1870) · Opera omnia

    Unresolved

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 1

Metadata

Authors
Rosen, E.
Affiliations
City College of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Rosen, Edward
Venue
The Historian
Published
1966-05-01
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
447-450
ISSN
  • 0018-2370 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-6563
OpenAlex
W2039552177
Cited by
1
References
1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1 (tdm, 18020 d)
Locations
Historian (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Historical Philosophy and Science
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › History and Developments in Astronomy
Keywords
Johannes Kepler, witch trials, witchcraft accusations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Kepler and Witchcraft Trials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1540-6563.1966.tb01751.x
The paper
Rosen, E. (1966). Kepler and Witchcraft Trials. The Historian. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6563.1966.tb01751.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.