"Law and Order" at Large: The New York Civilian Review Board Referendum of 1966 and the Crisis of Liberalism
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Police opposition to external oversight ensured that efforts to establish accountability seldom succeeded.
“Police opposition to external oversight ensured that efforts to establish accountability seldom succeeded.”
From To Protect and to Serve: Police, Power, and the Production of Inequality in the United States (2024) · cites this paper as Flamm 2002
Cited by
Sorted by citations
To Protect and to Serve: Police, Power, and the Production of Inequality in the United States
Felker-Kantor, M. (2024) · Crime and Justice · doi:10.1086/732194 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Flamm, M. W.
- Affiliations
- Ohio Wesleyan University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Flamm, Michael W.
- Venue
- The Historian
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2002-03
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 643-666
- ISSN
- 0018-2370 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-6563
- OpenAlex
- W2158643348
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Historian (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › American Political and Social Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
- Keywords
- police accountability, citizen oversight of police, referendum, crisis of liberalism, New York City Police Department, law and order, civil liberties, police reform
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
