Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 210

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Use of a Wearable Defibrillator in Terminating Tachyarrhythmias in Patients at High Risk for Sudden Death: Results of WEARIT/BIROAD

FELDMAN, ARTHUR M., KLEIN, HELMUT, TCHOU, PATRICK, MURALI, SRINIVAS, HALL, W. JACKSON, MANCINI, DONNA, BOEHMER, JOHN, HARVEY, MARK, HEILMAN, M. STEPHEN, SZYMKIEWICZ, STEVEN J., MOSS, ARTHUR J., WEARIT and BIROAD investigators and coordinators·2004·Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

Abstract

The automatic ICD improves survival in patients with a history of sudden cardiac arrest. However, some patients do not meet the guidelines for ICD implantation or are unable to receive an implantable device. This study tested the hypothesis that these patients could benefit from a wearable cardioverter defibrillator. Patients with symptomatic heart failure and an ejection fraction of <0.30 (WEARIT Study) or patients having complications associated with high risk for sudden death after a myocardial infarction or bypass surgery not receiving an ICD for up to 4 months (BIROAD Study) were enrolled into two studies. After a total of 289 patients had been enrolled in the trial (177 in WEARIT and 112 in BIROAD), prespecified safety and effectiveness guidelines had been met. Six (75%) of eight defibrillation attempts were successful. Six inappropriate shock episodes occurred during 901 months of patient use (0.67% unnecessary shocks per month of use). Twelve deaths occurred during the study 6 sudden deaths: 5 not wearing and 1 incorrectly wearing the device). Most patients tolerated the device although 68 patients quit due to comfort issues or adverse reactions. The results of the present study suggest that a wearable defibrillator is beneficial in detecting and effectively treating ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients at high risk for sudden death who are not clear candidates for an ICD and may be useful as a bridge to transplantation or ICD in some patients. (PACE 2004; 27:4–9)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2004.00378.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 210

Metadata

Authors
FELDMAN, A. M., KLEIN, H., TCHOU, P., MURALI, S., HALL, W. J., MANCINI, D., BOEHMER, J., HARVEY, M., HEILMAN, M. S., SZYMKIEWICZ, S. J., MOSS, A. J., & WEARIT and BIROAD investigators and coordinators
Venue
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-01
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
4-9
ISSN
  • 0147-8389 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-8159
OpenAlex
W2121889641
Cited by
210
References
1
FWCI
1.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Use of a Wearable Defibrillator in Terminating Tachyarrhythmias in Patients at High Risk for Sudden Death: Results of WEARIT/BIROAD. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2004.00378.x
The paper
FELDMAN, A. M., KLEIN, H., TCHOU, P., MURALI, S., HALL, W. J., MANCINI, D., BOEHMER, J., HARVEY, M., HEILMAN, M. S., SZYMKIEWICZ, S. J., MOSS, A. J., & WEARIT and BIROAD investigators and coordinators. (2004). Use of a Wearable Defibrillator in Terminating Tachyarrhythmias in Patients at High Risk for Sudden Death: Results of WEARIT/BIROAD. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2004.00378.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.