Inappropriate sinus tachycardia, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, and overlapping syndromes
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Inappropriate sinus tachycardia (IAST) and postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) are syndrome complexes with some distinctive features, overlapping clinical manifestations, and potential common mechanisms. Pathogenesis of these overlapping syndromes is poorly understood. Diagnostic and therapeutic approaches have not been standardized. PURPOSE: This article provides an overview of the definition, clinical presentation, and proposed mechanisms of IAST and other overlapping syndromes. A stepwise diagnostic approach is suggested. A multidisciplinary management scheme is outlined. METHODS: A MEDLINE search for English-language articles on IAST, POTS, and chronic orthostatic intolerance published up to 2005 was performed. Published data incorporated with our clinical experience were synthesized and presented in this review. RESULTS: The population of IAST is heterogeneous and underlying mechanisms are complex and likely multifactorial. Evidence suggests that both cardiac and extracardiac causes are plausible. Regional and limited autonomic neuropathies, at least in part, can provide a mechanism-based explanation of the cardiovascular indices and clinical symptoms in a significant number of patients with IAST. The regional abnormalities can be detected by autonomic testing. Among patients with IAST and evidence of autonomic dysregulation, an integrated autonomic, cardiovascular, and psychiatric management approach appears to be logical and rational when appropriate. Sinus node ablation could be considered in patients with persistent IAST in the absence of autonomic neuropathy and multisystem symptoms. Data from long-term outcomes are lacking. CONCLUSION: The current understanding of IAST mechanisms is incomplete and management approach is not adequate. Significant effort needed in clinical research to improve therapeutic outcome.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 41 · Cited by 98
- Authors
- BRADY, P. A., LOW, P. A., & SHEN, W. K.
- Affiliations
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- Corresponding author
- SHEN, WIN K.
- Venue
- Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-10
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1112-1121
- ISSN
- 0147-8389 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-8159
- OpenAlex
- W2136592299
- Cited by
- 98
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 0.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (P50NS 32352-8, P50NS032352, P50NS 32352-7)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
- Keywords
- inappropriate sinus tachycardia, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, autonomic neuropathy, autonomic dysfunction, pathogenesis, diagnostic approach, multidisciplinary management, psychiatric comorbidity
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Posture, Syndrome, Tachycardia, Tachycardia, Sinus
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review