The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Purkinje‐Related Arrhythmias Part I: Monomorphic Ventricular Tachycardias
Abstract
Purkinje‐related monomorphic ventricular tachycardias (VTs) can be classified into four distinct groups: (1) verapamil‐sensitive left fascicular VT, (2) Purkinje fiber‐mediated VT post infarction, (3) bundle branch reentry (BBR) and interfascicular reentry VTs, and (4) focal Purkinje VT. There are three subtypes of fascicular VTs: (1) left posterior fascicular VT with a right bundle branch block (RBBB) configuration and superior axis; (2) left anterior fascicular VT with an RBBB configuration and right‐axis deviation; and (3) upper septal fascicular VT with a narrow QRS configuration. The mechanism of the fascicular VT is macroreentry. While the antegrade limb of the circuit is a midseptal abnormal Purkinje fiber in the anterior and posterior fascicular VTs, the antegrade limb of the upper septal fascicular VT is both the anterior and posterior fascicles, and the retrograde limb is a midseptal abnormal Purkinje fiber. Purkinje fiber‐mediated VT post infarction also exhibits verapamil sensitivity, and the surviving muscle bundles within the myocardium and Purkinje system are components of the reentry circuit. BBR‐VT and interfascicular reentry VT are amenable to being cured by the creation of bundle or fascicular block. The mechanism of focal Purkinje VT is abnormal automaticity from the distal Purkinje system, and the ablation target is the earliest Purkinje activation during the VT. It is difficult to distinguish verapamil‐sensitive fascicular VT from focal Purkinje VT by the 12‐lead electrocardiogram; however, focal Purkinje VT is not responsive to verapamil . The recognition of the heterogeneity of these VTs and their unique characteristics should facilitate an appropriate diagnosis and therapy. (PACE 2011; 34:624–650)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Priori, S. G., Blomström-Lundqvist, C., Mazzanti, A., Blom, N., Borggrefe, M., Camm, J., Elliott, P. M., Fitzsimons, D., Hatala, R., Hindricks, G., et al. (2015) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehv316 · Cited by 3,893
EHRA/HRS/APHRS expert consensus on ventricular arrhythmias
Pedersen, C. T., Kay, G. N., Kalman, J., Borggrefe, M., Della-Bella, P., Dickfeld, T., Dorian, P., Huikuri, H., Kim, Y.-H., Knight, B., et al. (2014) · Heart Rhythm · doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.07.024 · Cited by 288
Li, X., Li, H., Ma, W., Ning, X., Liang, E., Pang, K., Yao, Y., Hua, W., Zhang, S., & Fan, X. (2019) · Heart Rhythm · doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.04.043 · Cited by 246
Ablating Premature Ventricular Complexes: Justification, Techniques, and Outcomes
Noheria, A., Deshmukh, A., & Asirvatham, S. J. (2015) · Methodist DeBakey Cardiovascular Journal · doi:10.14797/mdcj-11-2-109 · Cited by 54
Evaluation and management of premature ventricular complexes
Cantillon, D. J. (2013) · Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine · doi:10.3949/ccjm.80a.12168 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- NOGAMI, A.
- Venue
- Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-03-16
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 624-650
- ISSN
- 0147-8389 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-8159
- OpenAlex
- W2130198531
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Purkinje‐Related Arrhythmias Part I: Monomorphic Ventricular Tachycardias. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03044.x
- The paper
- NOGAMI, A. (2011). Purkinje‐Related Arrhythmias Part I: Monomorphic Ventricular Tachycardias. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03044.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.