The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Endocardial and Epicardial Ablation Guided by Nonsurgical Transthoracic Epicardial Mapping to Treat Recurrent Ventricular Tachycardia
Abstract
Nonsurgical Epicardial Ablation. Introduction: An epicardial site of origin of ventricular tachycardia (VT) may explain unsuccessful endocardial radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation. A new technique to map the epicardial surface of the heart through pericardial puncture was presented recently and opened the possibility of using epicardial mapping to guide endocardial ablation or epicardial catheter ablation. We report the efficacy and safety of these two approaches to treat 10 consecutive patients with VT and Chagas’ disease. Methods and Results: Epicardial mapping was carried out with a regular steerable catheter introduced into the pericardial space. An epicardial circuit was found in 14 of 18 mapable VTs induced in 10 patients. Epicardial mapping was used to guide endocardial ablation in 4 patients and epicardial ablation in 6. The epicardial earliest activation site occurred 107 ± 60 msec earlier than the onset of the QRS complex. At the epicardial site used to guide endocardial ablation, earliest activation occurred 75 ± 55 msec before the QRS complex. Epicardial mid‐diastolic potentials and/or continuous electrical activity were seen in 7 patients. After 4.8 ± 2.9 seconds of epicardial RF applications, VT was rendered noninducible. Hemopericardium requiring drainage occurred in 1 patient; 3 others developed pericardial friction without hemopericardium. Patients remain asymptomatic 5 to 9 months after the procedure. Interruption during endocardial pulses occurred after 20.2 ± 14 seconds (P = 0.004), hut VT was always reinducible and the patients experienced a poor outcome. Conclusion: Epicardial mapping does not enhance the effectiveness of endocardial pulses of RF. Epicardial applications of RF energy can safely and effectively treat patients with VT and Chagas’ disease.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rassi, A., Rassi, A., & Marin-Neto, J. A. (2010) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60061-x · Cited by 2,119
EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias
Aliot, E. M., Stevenson, W. G., Almendral-Garrote, J. M., Bogun, F., Calkins, C. H., Delacretaz, E., Della Bella, P., Hindricks, G., Jaïs, P., Josephson, M. E., et al. (2009) · Heart Rhythm · doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2009.04.030 · Cited by 770
Noninvasive electrocardiographic imaging for cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmia
Ramanathan, C., Ghanem, R. N., Jia, P., Ryu, K., & Rudy, Y. (2004) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm1011 · Cited by 646
JACOBSON, J. T., KRAUS, A., LEE, R., & GOLDBERGER, J. J. (2014) · Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology · doi:10.1111/jce.12318 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- SOSA, E., SCANAVACCA, M., D'AVILA, A., PICCIONI, J., SANCHEZ, O., VELARDE, J. L., SILVA, M., & REOLÃO, B.
- Venue
- Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-03
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 229-239
- ISSN
- 1045-3873 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-8167
- OpenAlex
- W2067703196
- Cited by
- 330
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Endocardial and Epicardial Ablation Guided by Nonsurgical Transthoracic Epicardial Mapping to Treat Recurrent Ventricular Tachycardia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1540-8167.1998.tb00907.x
- The paper
- SOSA, E., SCANAVACCA, M., D'AVILA, A., PICCIONI, J., SANCHEZ, O., VELARDE, J. L., SILVA, M., & REOLÃO, B. (1998). Endocardial and Epicardial Ablation Guided by Nonsurgical Transthoracic Epicardial Mapping to Treat Recurrent Ventricular Tachycardia. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8167.1998.tb00907.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.