What’s so inappropriate about sinus tachycardia?
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
While animal models of IST have been proposed, no compelling model exists.
“While animal models of IST have been proposed 38,39 no compelling model exists. 1”
From Inappropriate sinus tachycardia (2019) · cites this paper as [1]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 32 · Cited by 12
- Authors
- OLSHANSKY, B.
- Affiliations
- University of Iowa (US)
- Corresponding author
- OLSHANSKY, BRIAN
- ORCID
- OLSHANSKY, BRIAN
- Venue
- Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-08-28
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 977-978
- ISSN
- 1045-3873 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-8167
- OpenAlex
- W2119945569
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
- Keywords
- sinus tachycardia, cardiac arrhythmias
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Dogs, Heart Conduction System, Stellate Ganglion, Tachycardia, Sinus, Autonomic Pathways
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review