Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 190

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Long‐Term Outcome of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Impact and Predictors of Very Late Recurrence

WOKHLU, ANITA, HODGE, DAVID O., MONAHAN, KRISTI H., ASIRVATHAM, SAMUEL J., FRIEDMAN, PAUL A., MUNGER, THOMAS M., CHA, YONG‐MEI, SHEN, WIN‐KUANG, BRADY, PETER A., BLUHM, CHRISTINE M., HAROLDSON, JANIS M., HAMMILL, STEPHEN C., PACKER, DOUGLAS L.·2010·Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology

Abstract

Long‐Term Outcome of AF Ablation. Introduction: Ablation eliminates atrial fibrillation (AF) in studies with 1 year follow‐up, but very late recurrences may compromise long‐term efficacy. In a large cohort, we sought to describe the determinants of delayed recurrence after AF ablation. Methods and Results: Seven hundred and seventy‐four patients with AF (428 paroxysmal [PAF, 55%] and 346 persistent or longstanding persistent [PersAF, 45%]) underwent wide area circumferential ablation (WACA, 62%) or pulmonary vein isolation (38%). Over 3.0 ± 1.9 years, there were 135 recurrences in PAF patients and 142 in PersAF patients. AF elimination was achieved in 61% of patients with PersAF at 2 years after last ablation and in 71% of patients with PAF (P = 0.04). This finding was related to a higher initial rate of very late recurrence in PersAF. From 1.0 to 2.5 years, the recurrence increased by 20% (from 37% to 57%) in PersAF patients versus only 12% (from 27% to 39%) in PAF patients. Independent predictors of overall recurrence included diabetes (HR 1.9 [1.3–2.9], P = 0.002) and PersAF (HR 1.6 [1.2–2.0], P < 0.001). Independent predictors of very late recurrence included PersAF (HR 1.7 [1.1–2.7], P = 0.018) and WACA (HR 1.8 [1.1–2.7], P = 0.018), while diabetes came close to significance. In PAF patients, left atrial size >45 mm was identified as an AF‐type specific predictor (HR 2.4 [1.3–4.7], P = 0.009), whereas in PersAF patients, no unique predictors were identified. Conclusion: Late recurrences reduced the long‐term efficacy of AF ablation, particularly in patients with PersAF and underlying cardiovascular diseases. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 21, pp. 1071‐1078)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2010.01786.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 190

Metadata

Authors
WOKHLU, A., HODGE, D. O., MONAHAN, K. H., ASIRVATHAM, S. J., FRIEDMAN, P. A., MUNGER, T. M., CHA, Y., SHEN, W., BRADY, P. A., BLUHM, C. M., HAROLDSON, J. M., HAMMILL, S. C., & PACKER, D. L.
Venue
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-05-24
Volume
21
Issue
10
Pages
1071-1078
ISSN
  • 1045-3873 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-8167
OpenAlex
W2123378712
Cited by
190
References
3
FWCI
13.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long‐Term Outcome of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Impact and Predictors of Very Late Recurrence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1540-8167.2010.01786.x
The paper
WOKHLU, A., HODGE, D. O., MONAHAN, K. H., ASIRVATHAM, S. J., FRIEDMAN, P. A., MUNGER, T. M., CHA, Y., SHEN, W., BRADY, P. A., BLUHM, C. M., HAROLDSON, J. M., HAMMILL, S. C., & PACKER, D. L. (2010). Long‐Term Outcome of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Impact and Predictors of Very Late Recurrence. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8167.2010.01786.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.