Cited by 46Cardiac and Coronary Surgery TechniquesCongenital Heart Disease StudiesCardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair

Clinical Experience with Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene Gore-Tex® Surgical Membrane for Pericardial Closure: A Study of 110 Cases

MINALE, CARMINE, NIKOL, SIGRID, HOLLWEG, GUNTER, MITTERMAYER, CHRISTIAN, MESSMER, BRUNO J.·1988·Journal of Cardiac Surgery

Abstract

Complete closure of the pericardium after cardiac operations has the advantage of avoiding injury of the heart and great vessels during reoperation. Between 1985 and 1987, the pericardium was closed with Gore-Tex Surgical Membrane (SM) in a selected series of 110 patients 1 month to 76 years of age. Fifty-three patients had congenital heart lesions and 57 patients had acquired heart disease. Overall hospital mortality was 3/110 cases. In no instance was there a relationship between occurrence of death and pericardial closure with SM. There was one episode of cardiac tamponade on the seventh postoperative day. One patient developed fever and leukocytosis due to a mediastinal hematoma. During a mean follow-up of 15 months, four patients had to be reoperated upon three, four, eight weeks, and eight months after primary operation. The anterior wall of the heart had no adhesion with the SM and the other parts of pericardium could be dissected easily. Scanning electron microscopic examination of the explanted SM patches showed neither cellular ingrowth nor immunocompetent cellular elements. The Gore-Tex Surgical Membrane has the advantages of easy availability and lack of reaction between its surface and the epicardium and pericardium. We believe its routine use should be encouraged in patients with high probability of reoperation after repair of complex cardiac anomalies, implantation of bioprostheses, coronary revascularization for one- or two-vessel disease, and repair of degene…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1540-8191.1988.tb00239.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ePTFE's non-reactive nature minimizes the risk of eliciting an inflammatory response or fibrotic encapsulation.

    “Its non-reactive nature minimizes the risk of eliciting an inflammatory response or fibrotic encapsulation, common concerns with many implantable materials [240].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MINALE, C., NIKOL, S., HOLLWEG, G., MITTERMAYER, C., & MESSMER, B. J.
Affiliations
Universitätsklinikum Aachen (DE)
Corresponding author
MINALE, CARMINE
Venue
Journal of Cardiac Surgery
Published
1988-09
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
193-201
ISSN
0886-0440 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2122170587
Cited by
46
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cardiac Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
Keywords
expanded polytetrafluoroethylene, pericardial closure, cardiac reoperation, cardiac tamponade, mediastinal hematoma, biocompatibility, congenital heart disease, coronary revascularization
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Body Weight, Child, Child, Preschool, Follow-Up Studies, Germany, West, Cardiac Surgical Procedures, Hospitals, University, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Membranes, Artificial, Middle Aged, Pericardium, Polytetrafluoroethylene, Postoperative Complications, Reoperation, Survival Rate, Blood Loss, Surgical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review