Cited by 23Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationHealthcare Systems and TechnologyRadiology practices and education

Evaluating Patient Acceptance of a Teledermatology Link of an Urban Urgent‐Care Dermatology Clinic Run by Residents With Board Certified Dermatologists

Scheinfeld, Noah, Fisher, Michael, Genis, Paul, Long, Heather·2003·SKINmed: Dermatology for the Clinician

Abstract

Background. A teledermatology system was established in a dermatology urgent‐care clinic staffed by dermatology residents in the emergency department. These residents had previously lacked attending dermatology supervision. Methods and Patients. Resident physicians took digital pictures of patients' lesions and downloaded the images onto a network personal computer (PC). The images were stored on the hospital's server and then viewed within 5 minutes by an attending dermatologist, in a different location, using a network PC with monitor. Resident and attending physicians discussed the cases over the telephone. Patient acceptance was assessed via separate written surveys. Fifty‐one patients, approximately 10 resident physicians, and two attending dermatologists participated in the study. Results. Patient acceptance of the teledermatology system was high (93%.) Teledermatology May prove a viable means of evaluating dermatologic complaints in the emergency department.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1540-9740.2003.02187.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a rare study of an urban urgent care dermatology clinic, while patients generally reported high levels of satisfaction, 36% of the study sample expressed self-consciousness around the camera and 17% were uncomfortable having facial pictures taken.

    “In a rare study of an urban urgent care dermatology clinic, while patients generally reported high levels of satisfaction, 36% of the study sample expressed self-consciousness around the camera and 17% were uncomfortable having facial pictures taken.10”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Scheinfeld, N., Fisher, M., Genis, P., & Long, H.
Affiliations
  • St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center (US)
  • Jacobi Medical Center (US)
Venue
SKINmed: Dermatology for the Clinician
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-05
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
159-162
ISSN
  • 1540-9740 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-7125
OpenAlex
W2165299388
Cited by
23
References
2
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • SKINmed Dermatology for the Clinician (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiology practices and education
Keywords
teledermatology, patient acceptance, dermatology residents, emergency department, telemedicine, dermatology consultation
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Ambulatory Care Facilities, Dermatology, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Humans, Internship and Residency, Male, Medical Staff, Hospital, Middle Aged, New York City, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Photography, Skin Diseases, Urban Population, Telemedicine, Remote Consultation, Health Care Surveys

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review