Cited by 27Social Policy and Reform StudiesHealthcare Policy and ManagementHealth disparities and outcomes

Effects of U.S. States’ Social Welfare Systems on Population Health

Kim, Ae‐Sook, Jennings, Edward T.·2009·Policy Studies Journal

Abstract

Social scientists have studied the welfare state extensively. Many studies seek to understand the determinants of the welfare state; however, a few have explored the social consequences of social welfare systems, especially on health outcomes of the population. Even though cross‐national comparative studies support the thesis that the welfare state regime type, which represents different levels of commitment on social welfare, is closely linked to population health, there is little research to support this argument at a sub‐national level. To fill the gap, this study explores the effects of the U.S. states' social welfare systems on health using age‐adjusted mortality rates as a proxy for population health. By operationalizing social welfare systems as three dimensions—public expenditures, tax structures, and welfare program rules—we find that more generous education spending, progressive tax systems, and more lenient welfare program rules help to improve population health. The model corrects for first‐order serial correlation using Prais‐Winsten regression methods and is estimated with state and year‐fixed effects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2009.00333.x

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A one percent increase in smoking rates was associated with an increase of one death per 100,000 population.

    “a one percent increase in smoking and obesity rates was associated with an increase of one and two deaths per 100,000 population, respectively.”
  • Every $100 increase in spending on public education led to two fewer deaths per 100,000 population.

    “every $100 increase in spending on public education led to two fewer deaths per 100,000 population”
  • A one percent increase in obesity rates was associated with an increase of two deaths per 100,000 population.

    “a one percent increase in smoking and obesity rates was associated with an increase of one and two deaths per 100,000 population, respectively.”
  • U.S. states with higher spending on education, greater public expenditures, less regressive taxes, and more generous welfare policies had better health as measured by lower death rates, with effects stronger for overall mortality than infant mortality.

    “U.S. states with higher spending on education, greater public expenditures, less regressive taxes, and more generous welfare policies (as reflected in Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) and Medicaid program rules) had better health as measured by lower death rates, with the effects being stronger for overall mortality than for infant mortality [23].”
  • A one standard deviation change in tax progressivity resulted in 6 fewer deaths per 100,000 population.

    “a one standard deviation change in tax progressivity resulted in 6 fewer deaths per 100,000 population.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, A., & Jennings, E. T.
Affiliations
  • Indiana University – Purdue University Fort Wayne (US)
  • University of Kentucky (US)
Venue
Policy Studies Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-10-20
Volume
37
Issue
4
Pages
745-767
ISSN
  • 0190-292X (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0072
OpenAlex
W2072931760
Cited by
27
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
6.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Policy Studies Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Opus: Research & Creativity (Indiana University – Purdue University Fort Wayne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Social Policy and Reform Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
welfare system, population health, age-adjusted mortality, welfare regimes, education funding, progressive taxation, United States states

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review