The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Capturing Curiosity: Using Internet Search Trends to Measure Public Attentiveness
Open accessAbstract
While scholars have made great strides in formulating theories and measuring public attention, “most important problem” and media‐based indicators are less than ideal measures. In order to address this shortcoming, this article borrows from health‐care epidemiology to measure public attention based on Internet search trends. In doing so, it reviews the innovative ways in which scientists have used search activity to track the spread of infectious disease, discusses the ease and flexibility with which search data can be gathered, and then subjects a Google‐based search measure to a series of validity tests. In particular, the analysis subjects the proposed measure to a battery of visual and statistical tests for convergent validity by comparing it with the most commonly used media‐based measure of public attention—issue coverage in the New York Times. Across a range of policy issues (health care, global warming, and terrorism), the proposed measure demonstrates convergent validity. The article concludes by posing a series of important questions that the new measure will allow researchers to address.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion
Zaller, J. R. (1992) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511818691 · Cited by 7,785
Eysenbach, G. (2009) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.1157 · Cited by 1,351
Digital disease detection - harnessing the Web for public health surveillance
Brownstein, J. S., Freifeld, C. C., & Madoff, L. C. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmp0900702 · Cited by 819
Cited by
Eysenbach, G. (2011) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.2012 · Cited by 1,083
Bubbles in Bitcoin and Ethereum: The role of halving in the formation of super cycles
M'bakob, G. B. (2024) · Sustainable Futures · doi:10.1016/j.sftr.2024.100178 · Cited by 20
Exploring online search behavior for COVID-19 preventive measures: The Philippine case
Galido, A., Ecleo, J. J., Husnayain, A., & Chia-Yu Su, E. (2021) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0249810 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Ripberger, J. T.
- Venue
- Policy Studies Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-05
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 239-259
- ISSN
- 0190-292X (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0072
- OpenAlex
- W2118341952
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Capturing Curiosity: Using Internet Search Trends to Measure Public Attentiveness. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00406.x
- The paper
- Ripberger, J. T. (2011). Capturing Curiosity: Using Internet Search Trends to Measure Public Attentiveness. Policy Studies Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00406.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.