The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A System‐of‐Systems Perspective for Public Policy Decisions
Abstract
Problems of increasing complexity are facing decision makers within government and industry, and the key characteristic of these problems is that they are of system‐of‐systems type. With multiple, heterogeneous, distributed systems involved (including policies and economies as well as technologies), effective analysis for decision‐support quickly becomes unmanageable within the “stovepipe” context that still characterizes many organizations in the research and development community. There is not a process/field of study in place that can enable us to systematically solve these types of problems, exemplified by the Next Generation Transportation System. While indeed numerous tools are available to help, they cannot be used effectively because the people who build and understand the tools all speak different languages. Much confusion still remains about words and phrases for system‐of‐systems type problems, let alone the best modeling approaches for dealing with them. While pockets of organizational restructuring may address this challenge for particular projects, there is a lack of systematic thinking at the basic level about how to address the challenges. This paper recommends that intellectual, financial, and institutional resources be invested for the purpose of initiating and nurturing a field of study that will enable us to better address this important type of problem. The future of transportation serves as a motivating example of a multidomain, system‐of‐systems problem of critical importance to the nation and in need of effective decision‐support. The analogy of creating better maps and “navigation aids” for decision makers will be employed, emphasizing that, when navigating a minefield, knowing where not to go is the key factor in successfully traversing the terrain (i.e., making wise decisions).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Novel Cloud-Based Framework for the Elderly Healthcare Services Using Digital Twin
Liu, Y., Zhang, L., Yang, Y., Zhou, L., Ren, L., Wang, F., Liu, R., Pang, Z., & Deen, M. J. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2909828 · Cited by 763
Understanding Transportation as a System-of-Systems Design Problem
DeLaurentis, D. (2005) · 43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit · doi:10.2514/6.2005-123 · Cited by 264
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- DeLaurentis, D., & Callaway, R. K. “.
- Venue
- Review of Policy Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-11
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 829-837
- ISSN
- 1541-132X (ISSN-L)
- 1541-1338
- OpenAlex
- W2084058227
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A System‐of‐Systems Perspective for Public Policy Decisions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2004.00111.x
- The paper
- DeLaurentis, D., & Callaway, R. K. “. (2004). A System‐of‐Systems Perspective for Public Policy Decisions. Review of Policy Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2004.00111.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.