The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Open Dialogue Approach to Acute Psychosis: Its Poetics and Micropolitics
Abstract
In Finland, a network‐based, language approach to psychiatric care has emerged, called “Open Dialogue.” It draws on Bakhtin's dialogical principles (Bakhtin, 1984) and is rooted in a Batesonian tradition. Two levels of analysis, the poetics and the micropolitics, are presented. The poetics include three principles: “tolerance of uncertainly,”“dialogism,” and “polyphony in social networks.” A treatment meeting shows how these poetics operate to generate a therapeutic a therapeutic dialogue. The micropolitics are the larger institutional practices that support this way of working and are part of Finnish Need‐Adapted Treatment, Recent research suggests that Open Dialogue has improved outcomes for young people in a variety of acute, severe psychiatric crises, such as psychosis, as compared to treatment as‐usual settings. In a nonrandomized, 2‐year follow up of first‐episode schizophrenia, hospitalization decreased to approximately 19 days; neuroleptic medication was needed in 35% of cases; 82% had no, or only mild psychotic symptoms remaining; and only 23% were on disability allowance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vygotsky, L. S. (1964) · Bulletin of the Orton Society · doi:10.1007/bf02928399 · Cited by 20,704
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
&NA; (1988) · Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders · doi:10.1097/00002093-198802020-00022 · Cited by 12,526
Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics
Bakhtin, M. (1984) · doi:10.5749/j.ctt22727z1 · Cited by 5,909
Bowman, P. W. (1963) · AIBS Bulletin · doi:10.2307/1292957 · Cited by 3,638
An invitation to social construction
Bredenlöw, T. (2001) · Scandinavian Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/s0956-5221(00)00022-1 · Cited by 1,861
Marxism and the Philosophy of Language
Magee, P. (2013) · Cited by 1,632
(2010) · The Derrida Dictionary · doi:10.5040/9781350250307-0119 · Cited by 1,442
ANDERSON, H., & GOOLISHIAN, H. A. (1988) · Family Process · doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.1988.00371.x · Cited by 1,358
Therapy as social construction
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-4688 · Cited by 1,010
The Reflecting Team: Dialogue and Meta‐Dialogue in Clinical Work
ANDERSEN, T. (1987) · Family Process · doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.1987.00415.x · Cited by 969
Cited by
Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. C. (2013) · Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4276-5_25 · Cited by 269
A review of social participation interventions for people with mental health problems
Webber, M., & Fendt-Newlin, M. (2017) · Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s00127-017-1372-2 · Cited by 207
Keet, R., de Vetten-Mc Mahon, M., Shields-Zeeman, L., Ruud, T., van Weeghel, J., Bahler, M., Mulder, C. L., van Zelst, C., Murphy, B., Westen, K., et al. (2019) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-019-2162-z · Cited by 121
The Powerless Therapist and the Helpless Borderline: Acceptance, Aloneness, and Dyadic Joining
Erdman, A. L. (2017) · Psychoanalytic Social Work · doi:10.1080/15228878.2017.1323650 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- SEIKKULA, J., & OLSON, M. E.
- Venue
- Family Process
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-09
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 403-418
- ISSN
- 0014-7370 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-5300
- OpenAlex
- W2104932976
- Cited by
- 438
- References
- 38
- FWCI
- 3.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Open Dialogue Approach to Acute Psychosis: Its Poetics and Micropolitics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2003.00403.x
- The paper
- SEIKKULA, J., & OLSON, M. E. (2003). The Open Dialogue Approach to Acute Psychosis: Its Poetics and Micropolitics. Family Process. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2003.00403.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.