The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reconceptualization of the Uncertainty in Illness Theory
Abstract
The theory of uncertainty in illness has its strongest support among subjects who are experiencing the acute phase of illness or are in a downward illness trajectory (Mishel, 1988a). The theory has not addressed the experience of living with continual, constant uncertainty in either a chronic illness or in an illness with a treatable acute phase and possible eventual recurrence. Since uncertainty characterizes many, most prevalent, long‐term illness conditions, there is a need to reconceptualize the theory of uncertainty to include the experience of living with continual uncertainty. A close examination of the theoretical statements and the empirical data reported by Mishel resulted in the identification of areas of the theory that could be expanded and reconceptualized. The reconceptualization effort was primarily fueled by questions about the outcome portion of the uncertainty theory. To provide a contest for the expansion and reconceptualization of uncertainty, applicable parts of the theory are summarized below.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mishel, M. H. (1988) · Image: the Journal of Nursing Scholarship · doi:10.1111/j.1547-5069.1988.tb00082.x · Cited by 1,456
Self-citationSelf-control and predictability: Their effects on reactions to aversive stimulation.
Staub, E., Tursky, B., & Schwartz, G. E. (1971) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0030851 · Cited by 244
Cited by
Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: a theoretical model
Sprangers, M. A. G., & Schwartz, C. E. (1999) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00045-3 · Cited by 2,228
Communication and Uncertainty Management
Brashers, D. E. (2001) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2001.tb02892.x · Cited by 1,407
Varieties of Uncertainty in Health Care: A Conceptual Taxonomy
Han, P. K. J., Klein, W. M. P., & Arora, N. K. (2011) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x10393976 · Cited by 747
Information Seeking and Avoiding in Health Contexts
Brashers, D. E. (2002) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1093/hcr/28.2.258 · Cited by 641
Simonelli, L. E., Siegel, S. D., & Duffy, N. M. (2017) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.4168 · Cited by 292
Metadata
- Authors
- Mishel, M. H.
- Venue
- Image: the Journal of Nursing Scholarship
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1990-12
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 256-262
- ISSN
- 0363-2792 (ISSN-L)
- 0743-5150
- OpenAlex
- W2136322570
- Cited by
- 1,036
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 1.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reconceptualization of the Uncertainty in Illness Theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1547-5069.1990.tb00225.x
- The paper
- Mishel, M. H. (1990). Reconceptualization of the Uncertainty in Illness Theory. Image: the Journal of Nursing Scholarship. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.1990.tb00225.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.