The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nurses' Reported Thinking During Medication Administration
Abstract
Purpose To document nurses' reported thinking processes during medication administration before and after implementation of point-of-care technology. Design and methods Semistructured interviews and real-time tape recordings were used to document the thinking processes of 40 nurses practicing in inpatient care units in a large tertiary care teaching hospital in the northeastern US. Findings Content analysis resulted in identification of 10 descriptive categories of nurses' thinking: communication, dose-time, checking, assessment, evaluation, teaching, side effects, work arounds, anticipating problem solving, and drug administration. Situations requiring judgment in dosage, timing, or selection of specific medications (e.g., pain management, titration of antihypertensives) provided the most explicit data about nurses' use of critical thinking and clinical judgment. A key element was nurses' constant professional vigilance to ensure that patients received their appropriate medications. Conclusions Nurses' thinking processes extended beyond rules and procedures and were based on patient data and interdisciplinary professional knowledge to provide safe and effective care. Identification of thinking processes can help nurses to explain the professional expertise inherent in medication administration beyond the technical application of the "5 rights."
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“When deciding to follow an AI‐based recommendation, nurses serve as the last line of evaluation for the appropriateness of an intervention (Eisenhauer et al., 2007).”
From Artificial intelligence in nursing: Priorities and opportunities from an international invitational think‐tank of the Nursing and Artificial Intelligence Leadership Collaborative (2021) · cites this paper as Eisenhauer et al., 2007
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Eisenhauer L., 1998, Clinical pharmacology and nursing management
- 10.1002/nur.1017 · DOI
- 10.1001/jama.1995.03530010049034 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03091.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1442-2018.2004.00178.x · DOI
- Meyer G., 2005, Vigilance: The essence of nursing, Online Journal of Issues in Nursing
- Miles M.B., 1994, Qualitative data analysis
- 10.1037/h0043158 · DOI · Paper page
- Morse J.M., 1987, Nursing research: Methodological issues, 181
- Turner P., 2005, Critical thinking in nursing education and practice as defined in the literature, Nursing Education Perspectives, 26, 272
- 10.1097/00006223-200407000-00001 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ronquillo, C. E., Peltonen, L., Pruinelli, L., Chu, C. H., Bakken, S., Beduschi, A., Cato, K., Hardiker, N., Junger, A., Michalowski, M., et al. (2021) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.14855 · Cited by 453
Metadata
- Authors
- Eisenhauer, L. A., Hurley, A. C., & Dolan, N.
- Affiliations
- Boston College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Eisenhauer, Laurel A.
- Hurley, Ann C.
- Dolan, Nancy
- Venue
- Journal of Nursing Scholarship
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-02-26
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 82-87
- ISSN
- 0363-2792 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-6546
- 1547-5069
- OpenAlex
- W2128050536
- Cited by
- 157
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 18.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Nursing Scholarship (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
- Keywords
- medication administration, point-of-care technology, critical thinking, clinical judgment, nursing expertise, drug safety, inpatient nursing
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Clinical Competence, Communication, Drug Therapy, Female, Hospitals, Teaching, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Medication Errors, Medication Systems, Hospital, Middle Aged, New England, Nursing Assessment, Nursing Process, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Patient Education as Topic, Problem Solving, Surveys and Questionnaires, Thinking, Nursing Methodology Research, Safety Management, Point-of-Care Systems, Nurse's Role
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review