The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nursing Implementation Science: How Evidence‐Based Nursing Requires Evidence‐Based Implementation
Abstract
Purpose: Evidence is not always used in practice, and many examples of problematic implementation of research into practice exist. The aim of this paper is to provide an introduction and overview of current developments in implementation science and to apply these to nursing. Methods: We discuss a framework for implementation, describe common implementation determinants, and provide a rationale for choosing implementation strategies using the available evidence from nursing research and general health services research. Findings: Common determinants for implementation relate to knowledge, cognitions, attitudes, routines, social influence, organization, and resources. Determinants are often specific for innovation, context, and target groups. Strategies focused on individual professionals and voluntary approaches currently dominate implementation research. Strategies such as reminders, decision support, use of information and communication technology (ICT), rewards, and combined strategies are often effective in encouraging implementation of evidence and innovations. Linking determinants to theory‐based strategies, however, can facilitate optimal implementation plans. Conclusions: An analytical, deliberate process of clarifying implementation determinants and choosing strategies is needed to improve situations where suboptimal care exists. Use of theory and evidence from implementation science can facilitate evidence‐based implementation. More research, especially in the area of nursing, is needed. This research should be focused on the effectiveness of innovative strategies directed to patients, individual professionals, teams, healthcare organizations, and finances. Clinical Relevance: Implementation of evidence‐based interventions is crucial to professional nursing and the quality and safety of patient care.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Following this pipeline, a prerequisite for conducting an implementation study would be that the clinical/preventive intervention has already demonstrated effectiveness.”
From An Overview of Research and Evaluation Designs for Dissemination and Implementation (2017) · cites this paper as [109]
Citations
Cites
Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203710753-35 · Cited by 37,670
Valente, T. W. (2003) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.gim.0000061743.67794.c4 · Cited by 20,559
Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't
Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M. C., Gray, J. A. M., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71 · Cited by 15,769
Hietala, M. (1983) · Scandinavian Journal of History · doi:10.1080/03468758308579015 · Cited by 6,232
From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care
Grol, R., & Grimshaw, J. (2003) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(03)14546-1 · Cited by 4,531
Self-citationEffectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies
Grimshaw, J., Thomas, R., MacLennan, G., Fraser, C., Ramsay, C., Vale, L., Whitty, P., Eccles, M., Matowe, L., Shirran, L., et al. (2004) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta8060 · Cited by 3,044
Effectiveness of a hospital-wide programme to improve compliance with hand hygiene
Pittet, D., Hugonnet, S., Harbarth, S., Mourouga, P., Sauvan, V., Touveneau, S., & Perneger, T. V. (2000) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02814-2 · Cited by 2,524 · cited 1×
“practices, for instance, consistently indicate that hospital workers are compliant to hand-hygiene prescriptions in less than 50% of all relevant occasions (Pittet et al., 2000).”
BackgroundPlanning health promotion programs an intervention mapping approach
Bartholomew, L. K., Parcel, G. S., Kok, G., & Gottlieb, N. (2006) · Cited by 2,038
Enabling the implementation of evidence based practice: a conceptual framework.
Kitson, A., Harvey, G., & McCormack, B. (1998) · Quality in Health Care · doi:10.1136/qshc.7.3.149 · Cited by 1,985
(1997) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 1,226
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Halfens R, 2003, Verpleging en verzorging [State of the art studies]
- 2002, Toolkit: Implementation of clinical practice guidelines
- Rogers E.M., 1983, Diffusion of innovations
- Van Woerkom C, 1990, Voorlichting als beleidsinstrument [Education as a policy tool]
- Vermeulen H., 2007, Nuchtere kijk op de nuchtere maag: Onderzoek naar kennis nuchterbeleid voor OK, Nursing, 14, 20
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bridging Research and Practice
Tabak, R. G., Khoong, E. C., Chambers, D. A., & Brownson, R. C. (2012) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2012.05.024 · Cited by 1,386
An Overview of Research and Evaluation Designs for Dissemination and Implementation
Brown, C. H., Curran, G., Palinkas, L. A., Aarons, G. A., Wells, K. B., Jones, L., Collins, L. M., Duan, N., Mittman, B. S., Wallace, A., et al. (2017) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044215 · Cited by 509
A scoping study of frameworks for adapting public health evidence-based interventions
Escoffery, C., Lebow-Skelley, E., Udelson, H., Böing, E. A., Wood, R., Fernandez, M. E., & Mullen, P. D. (2019) · Translational Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1093/tbm/ibx067 · Cited by 307
“Using theories, frameworks, and models within dissemination and implementation research improves EBI implementation and sustainability, and the use of adaptation frameworks to increase acceptability, fit, and effectiveness is no exception [17,18].”
MethodA systematic review of hand hygiene improvement strategies: a behavioural approach
Huis, A., van Achterberg, T., de Bruin, M., Grol, R., Schoonhoven, L., & Hulscher, M. (2012) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-92 · Cited by 267
Self-citationLi, S., Cao, M., & Zhu, X. (2019) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000017209 · Cited by 173
Metadata
- Authors
- Van Achterberg, T., Schoonhoven, L., & Grol, R.
- Affiliations
- Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Schoonhoven, Lisette
- Grol, Richard
- ORCID
- Schoonhoven, Lisette
- Venue
- Journal of Nursing Scholarship
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-11-25
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 302-310
- ISSN
- 0363-2792 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-6546
- 1547-5069
- OpenAlex
- W2017533262
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 27
- FWCI
- 22.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Nursing Scholarship (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
- Keywords
- implementation science, evidence-based nursing, implementation factors, implementation strategies, research utilization, implementation barriers, decision support, information and communication technologies, organizational factors
- MeSH terms
- Diffusion of Innovation, Quality of Health Care, Evidence-Based Nursing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
