The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Violence Toward Nurses, the Work Environment, and Patient Outcomes
Abstract
Purpose: To relate nurses’ self‐rated perceptions of violence (emotional abuse, threat, or actual violence) on medical‐surgical units to the nursing working environment and to patient outcomes. Design: Cross‐sectional collection of data by surveys and primary data collection for 1‐week periods on 94 nursing wards in 21 hospitals in two states of Australia. Methods: Nursing Work Index‐Revised (NWI‐R); Environmental Complexity Scale (ECS) PRN‐80 (a measure of patient acuity); and a nursing survey with three questions on workplace violence; combined with primary data collection for staffing, skill mix, and patient outcomes (falls, medication errors). Findings: About one third of nurses participating (N=2,487, 80.3% response rate) perceived emotional abuse during the last five shifts worked. Reports of threats (14%) or actual violence (20%) were lower, but there was great variation among nursing units with some unit rates as high as 65%. Reported violence was associated with increased ward instability (lack of leadership; difficult MD and RN relationships). Violence was associated with unit operations: unanticipated changes in patient mix; proportion of patients awaiting placement; the discrepancy between nursing resources required from acuity measurement and those supplied; more tasks delayed; and increases in medication errors. Higher skill mix (percentage of registered nurses) and percentage of nurses with a bachelor of science in nursing degrees were associated with fewer reported perceptions of violence at the ward level. Intent to leave the present position was associated with perceptions of emotional violence but not with threat or actual assault. Conclusions: Violence is a fact of working life for nurses. Perceptions of violence were related to adverse patient outcomes through unstable or negative qualities of the working environment. Perceptions of violence affect job satisfaction. Clinical Relevance: In order to manage effectively the delivery of nursing care in hospitals, it is essential to understand the complexity of the nursing work environment, including the relationship of violence to patient outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Leadership practices and staff nurses’ intent to stay: a systematic review
COWDEN, T., CUMMINGS, G., & PROFETTO-MCGRATH, J. (2011) · Journal of Nursing Management · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2834.2011.01209.x · Cited by 280
Yang, Y., Wang, P., Kelifa, M. O., Wang, B., Liu, M., Lu, L., & Wang, W. (2022) · Journal of Nursing Management · doi:10.1111/jonm.13325 · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- Roche, M., Diers, D., Duffield, C., & Catling‐Paull, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Nursing Scholarship
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-03
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 13-22
- ISSN
- 0363-2792 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-6546
- 1547-5069
- OpenAlex
- W2156346805
- Cited by
- 431
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 55.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Violence Toward Nurses, the Work Environment, and Patient Outcomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2009.01321.x
- The paper
- Roche, M., Diers, D., Duffield, C., & Catling‐Paull, C. (2010). Violence Toward Nurses, the Work Environment, and Patient Outcomes. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2009.01321.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.